Show I It T i THE SUPREME COURT L 1 I I t i I Argnmenlsln I j Itie 1 Cast of HcCoralci 1i i lEt i t Al I L I I I I qUES1ION OK A MEN riiioiuir I I j 11 I I I Indie Marshall lion ullo llotli Car I II j elara TrlalTfe Yen Sot J I I Gullljrqolec 1 I I 1 I I t V The tupreme court listened to art is ar-t I I guments today In the case of the Bolt li II Lake lithographing company el1 I 1 I I ilalntlU TS Ibex Mine and Bmolllne 1 company et al 1 defendants W B I t McCorolok appellant vs Sierra I Nevada Lumber company respot I 1 dent Kneel the bearing of which their I 1 I 1 honors took the matter under advise I I f met In the early part of May 1693 1 be 1 I I plalntlOs on account of financial dial 11 I aultlea filed a crcdltotj bill I asking I L 1t I I 6 0 that a receiver be appointed who should turn Its assets Into money and i 1 i I pay the company debts under the t if tnYb 1 courts direction The receiver woo ap i I I pointed by Judge M L Itlctble li McCornlck the appellant asked I 1 leave Ibe J uiy followlngto files crosi fllltb leoorII f I complaint i against I all Ibo parties I Intimated In the action which the lc l rourt granted Tbe complaint of I 11 ppollant alleged among other IblnR I that the Ibx Mine and Bmelllng company cave him Its promissory if 0 tot I for 60000 due four man to-t a a after Maicu Oth 1895 Tula note was improperly r 4f 1 1 curd bya mortgage 01 the completive I properly In Mlllrd county Appel I I r t lautaikeJ to have the mortgage fore 1 i eled and that bo be given 0 llrat lieD 4l on It > 1 r All parties In tbe cite deny Mo I i I Cornlcks allegations which was J agreed to by allpulatlon I I I By leave pf the court the Sierra I JrJer er I ji Ojn flle4 Nevada Lumber company a cross 1 ii iry complaint against all parties In Interest t > Inter-est alleging the mine ol Its verified notice ol lieu upon the Ito x ompanyi I ut f onO g i I property on account oi us failure to I pay a balance of 372365 on lumber material famished The respondent company also seta I baWn 1Pb I 0 up thai Us lieu should be given a preference pre-ference over all other mortgages and I attachments I McCornlok In bid answer to the rNty j I I crosscomplaint of the 13 off Nevada 0 1 cimpany alleges that the Sierra J Nevada company waived Its lieu I I through having first oirnmenoed an J I > action against the Ibex Mine and 11t Bmeltlog I company l I The court found and decreed that Ii I hr Ibo claim of the Sierra Nevada company fl com-pany was a first lien end the McCoi IIi I-Ii nick moilzaje should come next I 1 McCornlck made a motljn for anew a-new trials which was overruled by 1 I I Judge lilies on the 12th of March last tc1J 1iJ J I and Train which MoCornlck appealed i I j to the Blare supreme court Attorney J I Prank Pierce IFosted today for Arc 1 1 1 coralck and F B Stephens for the Starts Nevada Lumber company 411I f li = il I DordD 1Ian Nestled q V Judgo Uubllloelrueld the Jury I 1 J InU1901619 01 Christopher Booth and i I I I Elisabeth Booth against receivers t uf the Union Pacific railroad com I 1 I PRDY4441910 I bring In a verdict for I I defendants today on the ground I 10 I of contributory negligence on the par Ji I I I of I Mr BontH q I rialntifl sued to recover lu000 1 i I damages and 720 expended Jut medical e r med-ical attendance atcs alleging psriOL t al Injuries recelvid I by Mrr I 4 J Booth on the 15th of February ISO 1 through being knocked down by ant dtlollr t eiglne I and dragged on the ground ifl ij while she was pusilng south along J Fourlb VI between Went FIlii North a nd 1 WoI Second North hI II was IUlibu alleged Ibal a If II rull of the scoldont Mrs Dnlb It I w fir 0 ken nor the ankl be wblcb be 10 I pumonllylnJurd besides rcelv Ihe Inlarl to br sea and back Ilwarl Stewart land 11 r Hnder on wers pllnllll attorney anti Uorg Bulherlud appeared for theCA rollrcad ell To minlee n H Tolo ills 69 h the next rn bi10H0LBL Ibe doekol 01 the federal court and mBY b Irld Ibis a 1Irnon Ulan I 1I0rl was bring mada 10 Kol onolber c ade ID bud 01 II I t |