| Show i > iumi UiLirituLii ttCC Vc have received capita of pelltloua llglnatlng In Uallfornli which aik Conjrns to abrogate tbu existing tclproclty treaty wllb Hawaii ou he ground tbat it la a terloua Injury to American producer and It In I Uoct a ichcme of giving foreign produceri of migar a heavy konu rom ihlioDUally Tbe lubiuuoa ol I be argument railed agalnit tbo exlit log treaty are flrit that lu eUecl It la nly partially aud nominally reclpto cl aeoiind that tbo United Slatet bat bteu uunoceatarlly deprived tbetetiy 01 t a vaat t amount of cuttoma revenue reve-nue through admitting Hawaiian ugar free though charging a duty on ther lugan tlilrJ that lu he praoll cal operatlou of the ugr butlneti Ibo pre CloD amount of lugar duty loit to he government accrue to tbe Jtlawal an planter and to tbe Amerlon tugar lull fourth tbat while tbe Handwlcli ilauda tugar can ba produced lucre wllb coolie labor at much lower cott ban It It possible lo produce beet augar bolo wllh wbll labor J tb recl roclly Irly tb gornmol II dually paying thu Hawaiian planter a itrolum lo Ibrtttle the local tduttrjj and filth that while at Ihe true lb treaty waa entered Into lu 873 It rra < of reciprocal benefit bene-fit lo Ibe United Btatet lo have Hawaiian lugar broutht In free owIng ow-Ing to tbo limited production here the coodillo b cbog nJ II Ie lb utyof government lo encourage Ibo ual beel aogar Indutlry by ceailng It lo loitering care to the Hawaiian ilanter and American engar truat who how poateas a decided advantage Tb argumenlo 10 Inor 01 tb ctlllawaltsn treaty propoilllo bckd by 0 1borl arr 01 Oilur oolnlrcate to require the ordinary reader lo delve Into On Ibe Brat proposition tlint of couip r tlvo non tecltr oily 1111 bowu Iballo Ibe Ilx canlb001603 there were admlttid rom Ibe HiuJwIch Itlandalntotbla oiunlry frie of duty iioods to the value uf J151S3039B3 or IS eroent ol the tottl volume of traJe leaving only 22 per cent on Ihe slJe of tula country At to the cmtomt revenue Ion hi It I figured out ti hr at be lame rated which tngar from liner countries bat to piy I 7C0715d at the exact cost of the reaty tothli government In twenty one ycare Oa the third proposition that of the virtual premium ptld to tbe Hawaiian planter and tbe American augar trust I lathowa that the Iruit receive lit tugar 10 quarter of a cent a pound eetthault la I pottlble obtain duty laying euzari ana as Ihe truit ban dlolho whole Hawaiian yield II hat n decided advantage over all compel 10 aod yel rcelud Irom Ibl 110 ernmool lu 1891 a virtual bouua of 11135000 asubtldf which acojuula lor the lireslellole power of tbe trust In lie dealing with sugar producers In Iblo country The fourth proposition It backed by the argument wllh the low price ul I coolie laher lu Uandwlcb It nnd la1 tugar can be laid down la Bao Franclicoatoneandthreelourtbi 10 two cents per pound while III la m t pottlbl to produce beet eugar at Ihit coit Tnue tbe Hawaiian planter aid tbo ugar trust have an overwhelm g inlageon their tide lu Ibo coI if production and Ibo premium that gO1 to tbem it nothing leu ban dlrtct atilBtauie from tbla country lo ild Hum IbrotllloE the local beel ugar Industry Aa to coolie labor Ibo itatlitlca bow tlat 70 per oentol Ibo almiereoutheUawBllan > Ul ar plantations plan-tations are Japauite and Gulnete an ujiij than hall ol these work under be contract tyttem Tbe Illtli reami for treaty ab ot lion aa to ou ued oindlllous la sup p rled by a thowlne that whllu lu Ib75 there wat only onb auiill beat ni r Ibo counlry Ibre re u uough U piuJuce about 45Ouu Iou and II la I asierled that If I i government assistance now given IhoUlh Ibo truly lolbo Ul trUl and UawilUu iliutert be wlihdriwr within two yean there will be tutll clunt laclorlei lo supply Ibo rucllu t deraauJ w He the average III 7000000 ter annum In one jear rtachlnj 13000000 which la I non going from tbe 1acluj ouast to tin daodwlch hind lot eugar would bo t d i orker > promoting kcal t irotpentj aud ytt not lucreailug Ibe ctit ol sutarlotbeoneuuier 11 la admitted that fiiuiea don Mr yet they on be made tbe meaui of an laiinemu amouiit of deceptive IUIIIIry at 110 Ihe AlguOlole 110 n < 1 eoo on over fiuelal f > OU h1 com u lor 1Iculloa I rollUeal I UIP Thll Inwlng 01 Ihl anll 11wlllo cllrooll 101 1 Is er 1001 bul Ibero I undoubtedl ootbor Idl 01 Iba Ior In aor ovol tbere to eoouab to arrnl IborouKb loqulr b Ooollr tolo lb trliole quesll nl |
