Show A1ISUI1MIIIS Of IIKillDU till llh1L Cert ilu lllble critic of n rallonallillc > ebcl I u ell with grout otiLfldeuce Illt Mima In l out the author uf lIlt I rentatiucb Tiny Ignore all rim lii llurlrnl evldeurnor the OOlolun view mi boo tubjett mid claim hut Internal Cfl hotCo 10 conclueivo UKaliut It Their Intercnl evideuou U I brltlly Jlhls fat tlie IlnlBUuch Inn ninny I050a tjwIilcliM ana uldnevtrlinvn Jwilltfu anti hut It how Iy JIll hUll mcntary characttr that It hu MVirnl uthorj lUe varloui nanm used for UolIJIIhlul uuu Juliuviih Indl oituii Jelinvlitnml an Klohlit I iiutlior and thu ritual law btura Ibo murk of u nuch later time liru Ii I hluled l nt III liuaulliorof the lat one If nut ulu Lily thou edit r ol Iliu whole book kud hv or tomuliody eltu vugralleil h J upon It the mjtln nod iFReudn of llnliylon prevlona to ImiliiK the work at the book of MUM 1 What art < the fuels III the nut place Ills nlmllliJ by all that there are wine pork of the r nlalvurh which MI I M purer wrote The narrative liln dth lId IUbo < 010001 ovenle wen ndde probably hy Joliiia and Mine versos were uvldent ly ilpluuiUry luturiwUUoiM by later trancrlber AtlJ the Cunamill I 0100 then In Hie land nnd Mw wan the mrckMt if men may h I xpalonoflhli clap When IIdllI l or by whom Ii Imluhblc 10 a ccr nlu hy any ordinary uieaiMvf nlitnrlrnl fforcU but such ioaoe may hire loon limited by lniplre l mm anil thereforn be l of ejilil I nuthorliy the orlglnnl teat At all tvtnlf they do not prove that MOM Ie l not the author of the 1enlaleuoh my more than Iho foot notes In the Dulrlne and CoTcnanl prove tlmt book lu be purloun tool nddlllnm and exphn glory lulcrpolalloni d nit amount tu 1111 III all Auto Ibo fragmtnluy character of l the torch Ills I not dented Hint tint author au-thor coiiMilttd varloui doeuinent for the hiatorloal part VltrluKi wo U I hoer worn the Ilrit who nude thli jtntlon but liu wa far from cool lelidlUR that t MOMH wiu not the author fill ijurillotmbh honor belongs to bout and IDM 1 profound chuhia Mueeo woos very Ieotnnd l nun mod it 15 but riUHiiabla lu ru > po > a lhat lie houlJ have availed huneolf of all that wu written Iwforn him nnd which woo within hb reach It I alto rea touibl to MJppuM that the circumstances circum-stances under which he wrote would he rtlliotnl In ills coinpo lllon < nnJ render them to tome extent fragnieulary Hut tu ooiiiliide from those prunlien lhat MOMM woo not the author la will an lanloal > i tu 003 that Irrwutt to 1 not the author nf hli faraoui liltlnrlii of the cgnUMtol Mexico and 1eru becuue he mail me nf vnrloui oilier looks l nod document for hU Ktfil work The argument Intel I oil ton mniM for Uod don not prove all that 10 1 claimed for IU It niiiiniM that the two n0ntes refer ti > Ibis canto rwrnon lu tho lodhud nhJ hence ooncludva that we have the oomiHMllhiii ol two dllicnl autiore Hut If It should Iw proven lhat Klohlni ktnudi f > ir one Divine IHMOII and Jrhovah for an other the whoo argunimt become nvalld Thoe who deny the aulhorihlp of MMH fuel the necemlty of banting aomvunn UN the prub tilu author Aud Ktra Ii iupponl In liavo wrltttn n great tart of the lVnt tmch the irkntly code nnd pcllini tu bur edltoJ nil of II and then lubllihed I It M tho work of Motoi In order tu mure I or acceptance Whu woe lUru7 AeoorJlng tahlttory he woo n lineal Uttremlant ol Anrou born prttuldy lu Jlabylon durlur the cnptlvlly lln will one of the mo l I rued Jews of Ml age and lilt chief jharacltrlillc were humility arid fervent zml for Hie glory nf Clod He Woo eminent for lobe I researches In law IIlId for hli I cine of honor and hu always both regnrohei0 Inferior only 10 i Moin Tube Ii the RIIWor or hli h I I tory C italii modern critic add Ihal ho wa also n literary forger u cheat a fraud VII anybody believe ihalT Hut even If 1 Em ahould have conceived con-ceived the Idoit of framing a jirlmtlj eruj0oe and forging n greet name to It hoaould nut have done II At that time n great tnnuy of Ihu Elder of Israel weru living who had men the old Tompla and < 1 iullclpilo1 In Hie rervliw Tho ancient law had Ixxn read tothmperiodically mil 1 lIa pro vlluui were Imprinted < 1 on Ihelr inludh They had t lUghl them tu their cloth roll nod relilvd Hie clrcum atanc under which they wero glvou Anyllilng nuw Hint Lira might liavo been dltpoted lo engrail upon this code would at once lane Iell detected t ThoM who would like lo have n practical Illuitratlou or tho force ol this nrguineul might try Ilia uperl moot of lubllihlng a new edition of theContUtutlou of the UnlloJ Htatix and etlll It nooordlug lo Ihelr own notion llnw longuouldlttakubtfore Ihelr fraud < J would bvexpowd Then liam had uu object to ialu by forging Ihu uama of Itraelit gmt lawgiver law-giver When he arrived In Jeruwikm Ihu T implilt Mum wa nil tlnlhed l and I rleti and Ijivltw urdalued bite iMrvIo tira U I lilt groat work wai nut therefore of n rltuallitlo but ol a mnrnl clianiiter Ito found uu Iola arrival that a great number of thin pea pip Including the prleilf boll violate II Ibo law of Mom by lulu marrying with the CmiaanllN nnd u reformation wo therefore vomuieiicud In which ho took n liiidlug art Ito I did not need for blob work any new ritual The juwlion 05010 not of a wparatlon Irom tho Jowls churel Mid thu uJopllon new riles but of cltHinliiK and urlfylui the oxlmlu church thruugh bloc enuirotuiont of thn moral code already nJopted KOI till re nm Ktrn did not bleat 10 pours ui a lIIeury lorgir Thnt thin Jevii abhor seven yenta kujouru In Hnbylon thould hive dolltli many wtitern myth and legundi and Incorporated thorn lu tin womb record In I n mipptitUlon alt Cellar too Impiobnlilv I Iook ut the Jeuacf today They buys now fur < uturlwmandtr d uiatrangiriun tbe foes of the earth without aiuiilry I without Maaluary uu 1 Tumple nvr out Ilul bow many Uhnnllan m Ilu and kneiid hmeihtiy aJoplinl In Ihelr cncrwl hooks ur bollcl or niodmoftliliiklnjT Let the moo hrll urlllor mower Uauildorlug tliu lituruul vvlduncu I tbo Ientateui It n 1 plain mat It Wm written toy one whom every send tnenl sot sympathy were those of n Jew and by one ruorwver who WM well verted In K yptln looming und knew the oountry of ArabU and Its nople Uut llerodotui ueuren ui that C yptlin leawlul l woo litdden from all but thu prtwu and inemuerii of the royal fAmily and rnrtlenlarly from stronger Iflhlili HI whore houlll a Jew obtain Hintlon 1 edumtlObT The IIIJltaty M xlreJ In the hltlory o f Motn nnd In I iiobudy elm within tho who range of nntl < 1 ully J > il rnal t vldenre It I almi I for Mum M III author Intuit all the evidence them he I ROM III favor of the aeoepUd view while he crltlchiu that colle llcuIb higher taooUnl to I dony Ihu evidence and nuUiituU far Ito baitrdoui gues1e |