OCR Text |
Show PARLIAMENT. Several Hew Peers in the House of Lards. (IliADSTOXK ATTAlKKIr. Sjllsrjary Siys thi Cjveramwl Seeks tbe Snpnort ot Cilrxlcals. IUL1III It IIAKM , NIT.11'11, lie trlllelsrs Hit lliiTseiitneol r.ir lis Ixjiillau I'nlley-lllniUiaue Ansitrrs. I.ndom, Jan. 31. In tha liouio of lordt auvcral new ncrt, Including Lord 1'Jayfnlr, look thu ontli. Tho I'rlnoeof Wale and lilt ton, the Duke of York, bad feats on Ilia cross bench. IiorJ Ilrassey moved the adoption ol thu addrcii In nj.ly to Ihu imecu'a sinecl). Hu motion was seconded by Lord '1 bring. Iloth tho mover and the seconder spoko In general terms In support of tho goverunient. l.erd Utllibiiry, who today appeared in lheopioiltloii, Ased n compliment on Lord Turing. Touching upon the question of home rule for Ireland Iiord riallibury tald one uf thu ubjeom of Ihu government uf thu pait six months had been lo p.et the support or a class of won who hitherto in politicians In Kngland hud tried to oonclllato. The keynote nf tbe Irish polluy of the goveriitmnt, It wai supposed, waa to gettheuprtor the criminal clissea. Ihoprerogitlvoor thoctownuad been used to aiilil 1 murderers and release dyuamllert. All the acta of thu gov-trnmtot gov-trnmtot caurid 1 1 Imprettlon that Ihey wero much moro In tymalhy with criminals thau deslrouiof vlndl citing tbe law. Crlia of "iftar! heat!" 'Ibo reference In tho queen's tpetcb to home rule was the most peculiar sentence he had ever teen lu a publlo document. It tecmid In Indicate that In tbu government's opinion tbo wbo.o Itlshmustlon with which parliament linj lodeilnaa that It waa right for one I orllon of tbu Irish lo placo tbelrheela uon tho necks ot tho protectant pojiu-lalloncf pojiu-lalloncf Ireland. With regard to other mravure. Indicated Indi-cated I u the queen' I eech lord Halls-tiury Halls-tiury di dare J that nobody bollevad that they would ever lie undertaken. This It simply u repetition ol the pro-gra&fJB1aa2d pro-gra&fJB1aa2d by the liberal conference vtttlailwlni. Lord Mallsbuiy alludeJ totho115rlctllMr.il deprettlpn, and aald that agiicullure badaullereil molt from wantnf confidence. Political partisans uowpreacbed doctrines that were filling fill-ing Ibe minds of owners of oapltal with npprchei,alon. Thcro was no country In the world, Lord Oalltbury udded, wherei roperty was now ao Insecure In-secure as In Ureal llrltlau In come-liionceol come-liionceol e no neoin legltlailvo action. Cries of heail heal!" rheKarlof Klberly mildly romon-atrated romon-atrated with Lord Halltbury for aocut tag the government of having aym-pathy aym-pathy for Irish criminals. He promltej tilniroduoe the bomu rule bill In the houtaof lorJa as It patted tho omnium. om-nium. When thu promise wat heard faint laughltr rip; led over tho benchia. The Iiuute then adjourned. lu the commons this uveulng notice that Uladtluiia would Introduce lilt home rule bill Mouday elicited prolonged pro-longed HI eral uhcers. At 6.30 o'clock Mr. I. Hubert, a liberal, lib-eral, rosu to move an address. He spoke tu empty bandits, na uld Mr. lleaufers, Mho seconded the motion. The bouse filled like magic, howuver, when Mr. llalfour arose, and, amid a storm of opposition cheers, began, In a sneering toue, a general criticism of thu govern intut lu Ua Kgyptlau policy. Mr. llalfour said tbu mlulsters oould rely uiionthe tupport of tho opposition ao long at Ihey upheld llrlllali rights. He trusted that thu government would at the earliest convenience let Parliament Parlia-ment kuow tho ciutcs which led to tbu recent troubles lu Cairo. Among the causes, uiiloubtndly, were tho rash ulterancea made by tbe prime minister and chief secretary for Ireland when they wereluopiKitlllou. Mr. llalfour denounced tbe Kvictrd Tenant! ooinnilsilou as so unfairly osnillluted that they wero Incapable of pr editing truilwortuy rcportt. He demanded ibut the home euorotary should say whether or uot the releatu of llgan and Callau, Die Irish dynamiters, dyna-miters, wat part of a policy of amnesty Intended tu Involve the release of all the Irish dynamiters, Mr. (Halftone was cheered loudly when he arose to answer Mr. llalfour. Hu repruiched Mr. llalfour for assailing assail-ing with tullimmatory criticism n bill tbut bad not yet been Introduced and for doing his utmost to prejudice lbs minds ot lilt followers agalntt n plan of home rule ol which he wat still lirnorunt. Mr. llalfour had asked where there w as an empire which had been strengthened by the adoptlun of local autonomy. Mr. (llndttuue replied re-plied that us Lord Salisbury had done koine )ir ago, be would point to Austria-Hungary. Iluwould altopolut lo the llrltUli colonies, which sixty years ago were ruled from Loudiiu, but demanded i-eparatlon until self, government waa Dually granted. He would nut reply to Mr. llalfour'aluveo-llveualiist llalfour'aluveo-llveualiist Morley'-i administration of Ireland, except to say tbu wise policy of clemency had been simultaneous with a ureutilecreasoof crime, Mr. ISalfour's alluok on the evicted tenants commla lou recoiled upon himself. him-self. Mr. llladaunu did not believe Itiat III his long parliamentary career he ever uttered wolds no rath aud dan-lieroui dan-lieroui ere Ihutu uttered by llalfour concerning tho dllllcultleM lu I2gypt, Theee wordsteenied to tuggest Hint thu government would losu nv llnio In celling out of Ugypt. Mr. llalfour arose nu I repudiated tho charge that hu had tuggitto! the probability prob-ability of hasty evacuation. Ccnlliiulug, Mr. Gladstone sold tho government had not bad time to con. tlder tbo inititlou of occupation, but merely tbo mtluletianco of or lor. Mr. UU'lalone repelled Iho aipoal tv thu huuio not to be moved by premMure deuuuclatlon of thu homo rulo bill. |