OCR Text |
Show PARLIAMENT. Several Hew Peers in the House of Lords. OliiilSTOXB ATTAtKKIl. Silisbary Says Ibt Gwrauient Seeks tbe Support cl Criminals. lUMiaii jmkis Ni'rtiir. He (rlllrl... il ll..,,, rr . luJMInn Pnllry-lllmUiaue Ivnov, Jan. 31. Iii tho liouio of lordt several now -.icrs, Includlnff Lord Tlayfalr, tojk the onlli. Tho l'rlnnoof Wait' and nl son, tho Duke of York, bad seats on the cross bench. I.ird Illnvey moved the adoption ol tho addrets In rely to Ihu queen's spreoh. His motion wat seconded by Lord lhrlmr. llolh tho mover and tlio seconder tpoko In genernl termt In support of the government. lird Hillibury, who today appeared In thJ oj io-ltlon, -ft-eetln compliment nn Lord Tilling. Touching UHn Ihu queitlon of home rule lor Ireland Itord tjall-bury taldoneuf Ibeobjeols of tho government ol the putt six months bad been to cot the tu port of a (lots of moil vim hitherto no politicians In l.iiglandh.d tried to ooaclllato. The keynote nf the Irish policy of the governmi nt, It wai luppoted, was to getthe-upportof the criminal oliaies tho prerogative of the clown bad been uiedtoihiill murderers and rcleaio lyusmltert. All the acts of the government gov-ernment laused lie Impreitlon that they wero much moru In symiathy with criminal-than deilrouiof vlndl cntlng tbe law. Crlis of "Heart lienll") Ihe referenco In tho queen's speicb to borne rule was tho most peculiar sentence he had over seen 111 a publlo document. It leemtd to Indicate that In tbe government's oplulon tho who e Ill.li question with which larllament had to do il w.t that It was right for one I orllon of tbe Irish to jlseo tbolrliee's ill on tho necks ot tlio protettanl population popu-lation of Ireland. With n gard to other measures Indicated Indi-cated In tbo queen's speech lord Halls-bury Halls-bury declared that uubody believed (hat they would ever be undertaken. This it simply u repetition ot the pro K3ttHlK4 "' ""' lll,e"l con'cronce mMBUHWln . Lord Hullibury alluded to llio HRrlciiltUMl deprestlpn, and ssld that ugtleulture had suffered mott from want nf coulhleuce. Tolitlcal pirtlaans now preached doctrines that wero filling fill-ing the mlndi of owntrt of capital with Rl rche-sbn. There was no country lu the world, Lord Uallibury added, where iropertyvt its now to In-ecurnnsln In-ecurnnsln (ireit llrltlin In oonie-iiiuncenl oonie-iiiuncenl orroieoui tegltlatlve action. Cries of bur! hcilJ TheKarlof Klberly mildly remonstrated remon-strated with Lord Ball. bury for accusing accus-ing the government of having sympathy sym-pathy fur Irish criminals. He promlied t) Introduce tho borne rule bill In the house of lorJa us It pa-.od tho om-mom. om-mom. Wlu n tho promise was beard faint lautjlittr rippled over tho bonclus. The liuuie then adjourned. lu the commons this uveulng notice that Uladaloiie would Introduce his home rule bill Monday elicited prolonged pro-longed llteraluhcers. AtSSdu'clook Mr. Limbert, a liberal, lib-eral, roso to move an address. He spoke to eiu ty benchts, as did Mr. lleaufers, who seconded the motion. Thehouso filled llku magic, however, when Mr. llalfoururote, and, amid a storm of opposition cheers, begau, in a sneering tone, a general criticism of the government govern-ment In Its Egyptian policy. Mr. llalfour said Ihu ministers oould rely Uionthe support of the oppuiltlon so long at they upheld llrlllsh rights. He trusted that ihu government would attbuearllettouuvenlenca let Tarlla-ment Tarlla-ment know the oiu.es which led to tbu recent troubles In Cairo. Among the ostites, uu loubtedly, were the rath utterances nude by tbe prime minister and chief secretary for Ireland when they v. ere I ii opposition. Mr. Ilalfour denounced tho Kvlcted Tenants commls.lon as to unfairly ontmlUuted that they wero Incapable of pr seutlni trustworthy reports. He demanded ihut the home seoretary should tay whether or not the release of Lgan and C'sllaii, tbe Ill.li dynamiters, dyna-miters, wai pattofapollcyof amnesty liiloudtd to Involve the release of nil thelrl-h dynamiters. Mr. Uladstone was cheered loudly when he arose to autwvr Mr. Ualfour. Huru roit bed Mr. Ilalfour for assail-lug assail-lug with lnllammatory crltlclain u bill that bad not yet been introduced and for dniug his utmost to prejudice the mludiol his followers agaloil n plan of home rule of which he was ttlll ignorunt, Mr. Ilalfour bad atked where thiro was an empire which bad been strengthened by Hie adoptlou of local autonomy. Mr. (lladttouu re-pllid re-pllid tlmtui Lord Ball-bury had done ome yoirs ago, lie would point to Aiittrla-HuiiKary. lie would alto paint to tho llrltltli ooloulis, which nixly years ago wire ruled from Loudon, but demindeil tepsratlon until self, government wat finally granted. Ho would not roply to Mr. llalfour'sliiveo-ilveugaliut llalfour'sliiveo-ilveugaliut Morley'sadmlnlitrallon of Ireland, except to tay the wlto policy of clemency had been slmullanoout wllh n ureut decruateof crime, Mr. Ilalfour's attack on tho ovlcted tenants tonimls Ion recoiled upon hlru-oil. hlru-oil. Mr. Ulndttoiu did not believe that III Ills long larllamenlury osreer hoover uttered winds so ranh aud dan. gerout us were thotu uttirod by Ilalfour concerning llio dllllcullka lu lgyM. rtieee wordsieemed to tuggett that tho government would lose uu time In getting out otKglpt. Mr. Ilalfour nroteau I repudiated the charge that he bad tuggitteJ the prob-ability prob-ability of batty evacuation. ('cntlnutug, Mr. Uladstone said the government ba I not bad time to can-elder can-elder tbo quettlou ot occupation, but merely tbo m-lnlonanco of or Jer. Mr. nialalone repelled the aioal to tliu liou.e uolto be moved by rreinMure denunciation of Ihu home nils bill, |