Show I I Good od Reason for Not Nol L Filing Long Brief Briel V LOS A ANGELES Feb 0 Attorney I.-Attorney Attorney E E. E M. M D Barnes ll of I Los os Angeles is the theauthor theauthor author of a brier brief on file toda today in the time supreme court that is is unique because of f its ts brevity ity and phraseology r Appellant is unable to print an ex cx- ended tendel brief it reads U and and so 80 would be most nay nu one Who whoso whose f property had lad been taken by Lr sonic some one oue to to pay payO debt he is li broke and it sonic O om 1 one eJ else's 5 a n appellants appellant's counsel IS is badly bent The w cost of time tho litigation fa falls fails on appellants appellant's ap f counsel V The Time case ease arises es out of u n alleged allege conversion con con- version of 1500 worth of personal Jos the decision deci pr property p rt the plaintiff losing ng V lIon sion In inthe the superior court |