Show DRAMATIC V INCIDENT IN V CASE CASEM CASEI I M Misunderstanding s nd at t Time Labor L Leader ader Was Sentenced V Y WASHINGTON ASIU Feb S. S John S-John John Mitchell's Mitchells Mitch Mitch- ells ell's trial for o of court in fl he tie was n n d Ith S Samuel Samue muel Compels and Frank Morrison officials official's V o of fc the American Fed FederatIon of ot Labor V In connection con COO with vUth the th-e Bucks Buck's stove Bucks st ve and range range boycott case case- took on a a. dramatic touch at the hearing healing today todar V Mr Mitchell had h d seemed see ed 0 io be criticising ing Justice Wright before T hom he lie I is on tri trial l. l and the Justice had displayed play d some impatience with T Ida his critic L r Let t me explain plain this thi- said Mr Mitch Mitch- ell h ve much in my mv heart i 1 I n said and wT ich has baa perhaps no ln these lese paragraphs VAt At the tha time I was vas summoned to toto to appear for tor Judgment I II raCed faced a lon lone bong te term teem m In It ivas was th the Jay day b before for eve ev I Iwas was wa leaving New York I had not seen my family and chU children ren who were wee in fn Illinois Illinois- for or two months month I lund had bought vand d pac packed ed In my grip to tov toys and anil gifts C for formy rm my children I I Wa was wat Wa toa to tO- tO to-re to 15 in my I asked t the e d lIe lIe- Islon lt p on d wU WM W br brought here and nd sentenced d r r. Believed He WaS Right Bight I I had morel don what JI l 1 I b efi belIeved lle was U i my right under tl K government mt my father bad niad lad aught to uphold So wh when I n nI I ap appeared liPp liP liP- p red anSI liS as sentenced d sOil and discussed d it It afterward I could not to and did Hot disguise dU rl my feelings At being sentenced on the da day before ChrIstmas and anft I Ml felt outraged d that I J did not muot r le lec receive re- re c J e the same same- consideration that would have hV be been given gi the WOl t offender V I in III tho th theland land V r Mr l Mitchell Mithell hell said Mid Judge lud Wright you OU have havo shown some som bitterness toward t ti ie court for tor th the m manner In which you ou were ere sentenced What VhAl reason reA-fon have you yoi OU for belle that t th the court knew of ot your our ou request for Cor a R. postponement nt I l wrote to the this president pre of or Amer Amerlean rII r- r II lean n Federation of or Tabor and Anet a asked ked It It replied Mr fr Mitchell 11 I supposed that tha m mv my request had been buen con con ey conveyed eyed d to to th the court Not Request but Demand No 0 request l was waa 8 cl to 0 the h hI I court ourt 1 implied d th the justice it came as asa asa a tI demand There Thern was tun lin atmosphere o ot of otI anta antagonism about bout it It i was VAR a a. I from frim th the vice Jc president pr of lor the American I Federation of or Labor I-abor for a postponement I did runt not think h he 1111 had any more morro right to demand it than an any oth other r m mao man n. n A Attorney Home Alton B 13 PArker for or Mr Mitchell Iu s ted that hat there bad Iad been beena A R mistake and 1 Ki ho who presented tho the x demand ti c Wright rl ht explained th that t a Washington Wash Wash- In ington lawyer laWer h had d approached him in inha Chambers ha hamb V L 1 hava ha b b cn n under tinder th tham that tha t tm m my request t. t 8 as cd fon to the cour courand court c and was was was' a denied If 1 I ha have hAh be h hsen n wron wrong In that I would not do the court an In Injustice In- In justice jU and I regret that I have made It soy so 0 said Mid Mi h Mitchell |