| OCR Text |
Show Third District Court. The following business came before be-fore Judge Zane yesterday after noon: Iu the case of Lydia F. Thompson Thomp-son vs. William Thompson, the defendant de-fendant failed to appear and a decree of divorce was granted. Iu tbe case of K. M. Riley vs. C. D. hit. George, in which a motion for a new trial was recently submitted, sub-mitted, Judu Y.iuu held that tbe .vemlttfor thutilalutifTshouId be re. I duced from S.W0 to J200U. In thu case of August Larscn vs. the South Galena Mining Comjany, In which the plaintiff recovereu $7500 damages for the loss, or a leg through the negligence of the defendant, de-fendant, a tnotiou for a new trial w as argued and submitted. in tbe case of U. S. EIIIon vs W. II. Porter et al., in which theplalu-llfl theplalu-llfl seeks to loreciose a mechanics' Hen, the bearing was yesterday set uy Judge Anderson for Wednesday next. Tho case of J. S. Bowers vs. Jennie Jen-nie Fruiseth et. al., was continued until today. Tliebeiring in the matter of the estate of Itichard Gollghtly w as set for this afternoon. Charlotte Van Dyke vs. .Robert PixtouetnL; demurrer argued aud submitted. B.I). Murphy vs. Jas. Stockdale et al.; demurrer argued and submitted. sub-mitted. Kliza Cook vs. O. B. L. .fc II. X. railway company; motion for a new trial submitted. Judge Anderson heard only one motion yesterday Charlotte Van Dj ke vs. Robert t'ixton et al., a ue-murrer ue-murrer to an amended complaint. The matter was taken under advisement. advise-ment. The following business was transacted trans-acted In Judge Zaue's court today: Kalherlne Mill vs. Nicholas Falkner et at; motion to reinstate argueJ; appeal deuled. Eliza Cook vs. Oregon Siiort Line and Utah Northern Railway Company; Com-pany; motion for a new trial argued, submitted andconsIdered;7verruled; exception taken. P. D. Murphy vs. James Stock-dale Stock-dale et al.: defendant's motion for a new trial allowed. Bsrney C. Harvey vs. Amelia I). Harvey, order for temporary alimony to defendant iu thesum ol $50 per month aud SUM for expenses of trial aud J200 attorney 's fee. In tbe case or Hyrum Harris vs. IUcbani Chlpman; ten days additional addi-tional time allowed In which to file statement for new trial. In the caseof Lmma C. Wells vs. Uio Grande Western Railway Company; Com-pany; hearing of motion tor new trial set for December 22. L. G. Hardy et al. vs. Henry Worthen et al.; motion or defendants to set aside Iudgment argued by Williams and Ritchie; submitted and considered. Inthccate of the United States vs. Christian Kriner; demurrer to complaint argued by Arthur Brown; submitted and taken. In thecaseof A. J. Burt vs. II. W. Dtvis; motion of defendant to set aside verdict and grant a new trial; in progress when the court adjourned until Monday at 10 o'clock a. m. The following cases were disposed of before Judge Anderson today: Iu the case of J. S. Bowers vs. Jenny M. troseith; deceuof lorr-cksuro lorr-cksuro sustained; plaintiff" allowed ten days to amend complaint. The case of J. WKardley vs. D. D. Houtz, administrator; hearing set for January 3, 1S91. Tho cae of W. H. Gibson vs. De Witt II. Lowe, in progress. |
