OCR Text |
Show KIIUST DISTIllCr COUIIT. Tlie Jury ImlrurlfJ h llrlnj In a UrJIet or Not UalllJ In Hie Joiica f uilitxlcmfiil (ir The Pcoplo va. 1.. W. Jonca, ex. naaeaaor and collector for Tmery Conn ly, clurgid with eiubcu lllft SVUUOI from the county'a fundi, argued before JuJue Mluer at l'ruvo yoaler-day. yoaler-day. Attlmr l'ratt w Ihe firit wltntua. lletoillilftl: I amUrrltjrUU'iJItor. No, .10 U mMvA warrant, iiIIiiik for tWftM waa drawn by li V. Jones on llioSlh of February, IH'i. Tliewnr-nut Tliewnr-nut wan laaiivl nud rredllel, Oir hooka ahow achargo ajratunt Jonee of fllUI.-Oonl he It crodlleJ with a rt-lilltUnw rt-lilltUnw of $M, recelpll JTIiWtiO, ofcrchargo iS0, and remUUiae MI1.U CruM-exaiuliied by JuJd March IS, IS9J, I bicimo auditor. The Iwoka were keit I y Mr, X. W. Cliytoa prior lothla. N.W.Chylon te.llflnl to thewnr. rant referred lo having been audited to the account of 1 . W. Joma. The warrant waa niual tu the cnih on the account. I rim examined 1) not know whetheror fiot Jonia copicted any m ney on Uxts. Knew Jonen In hl oniclalcajiclty. He aa.ired to Im luroiitiietent to attend to thu dullce of thnonlce. JarueiJaeltteetineil to the warrant llnif 1 Lv.tJ to the credit of Mr. li W. Jonta, W. V. Cranforl ttatlried to the tealnatlon ef Mr. Jonea In 18SB. Mr. Co iralinrd aa folloua In lf"J 1 waaiiiperliilriidentof dlatrlctflthoola. I laaued a number if onlini for the i)'-inunt i)'-inunt of truiteei to the ninouui of nearly $4J0. Converinl with the dr. fendaul about the onlera. He aj I ho bad not collected enough money to) ay the orders. Mr. (Ireeo, a school truateu of 8ot fleld, ItatlHed that a bulaoco was due thedlatrlafromMr. Jonea of 175.37, none of which haa been paid, although JudmcDt of the court waa found fur fit 1.40 aaluat Jours. Uroine Niithirlind IratlflcJ to what was dour In the civil emu aalnt Joues, nhrroln $111 40 nud another amount of$J7!t waafuiiui due from Jonts. Truttee Illrch, of Lawrentedidrlcl, 1'mery county, teitlflnl to $7172 be luir laud on an order of SIS7 duo the dlatrlcl. Mr. Jonea acknowledged that the order was rorrrtt, Lut rould not lay It on account of lack of fuids due from hla deiaillea He spoke of the warrant thai had been credited lit him, but did not alate the amount. Mr.lluley,tiutUeori'rlcedltikl. slated that an ordi r of J3 11 was litunl for money due Ida dlatilct wbhh wna unpaid; tlnU'.iv of the amuunt had ant S'liiienlly been old by Jours, and Urn Mime remains due. Mr. Vatlan atated Hint lit ha I Introduced In-troduced nil thu evidence at hand, which dlfilied tbe fatt that there had Imnndlicreiancy In thu accounts of Mr. Jonea, but uoUitrt In Ihuerl Icnro went to show that the difindint hid apt roj rioted luouey lo his own use, I huJuJita Inslruitiiit tliojury tu return verdict of uotgiillly, Morrli Nay was arrahrned nu n chnrfjoofglaudlirveuy. lleplinl not gii Illy. Orlando Ilrrron vrlllidrcw Ills plea of noticullly tothuchareeotalulteryand jdv&d guilty Hcnteuce was set fur March J. William Montr was arraigned on a rhancti of unlawful cohabitation, to which ho i lead not guilty. The grand Jiry mine Into comt and reported hlnnfndlctmunte The follow. Iiiif were Ignored! The United Htittea va. l.lltabetli Alidaraon. fumlijitlilii. TiNiple vs. Itaiiuus ells?ii, crand larceny. UeorgsTliomsswiu nrraUnrd on a charge ef burglary, committed at the n-sld' nee of It H. lodJ,ln l'rovii. Hu lead rullty nud i as sentenced for n term of five yearn. Ilritirrt A. Talbotlwav arraigned charged with having (omndtlcd gran I larceny by stiallnga horeo near Htanlli Turk, He ileal guilty mil was rtutencet to three) vara lnirlK)iiuivnL VA. Kellay sua arralKued itiargod Mltli grand larceny. He pleim not guilty; havlne no a tornsy, Mr. White. cotton was aerlgiul to defeti I him rbomaa MoUraUi, Michael McUloty anl 1 riuk Oerue were arraigned charged with burglary, committed at Hjauilfh lorh by entering the Co-op. siorr. They all plead not guilty, liA. Wllfou wasapiailoted to defend them. Ihecaaeof the People vs. Iluikuer, chargetl with laneuy, which iom up ou apiwal, was dlamliae 1 ou luotlou of the protecutlug attorney. CXIIlUN. The following bualntis was dlajaised Of 111 theUgdell dlvlalou of the lint lllatrlct Court yrsterdayi the Veiple va. 1 rauk Ktevem: nr-ralgneil, nr-ralgneil, thai uot K'dllj; bond llaiedatllMl. W.C. Auuuttet al. vs.Win Ok'lnin!; decide I an njiilly case and stilckeu from the rail. I.ana Walalrom vs li A. Parsons, II. P. llendeisjn euteied his aiprnr-suce aiprnr-suce for pliilntlir l.eun Walalrom vs. li H, Parsons, trial pending. J.M. l.ani.dorfvs F. lI.ICel.il, ou motion of ltlcharda, llolai p & Jluriou, order irmlttli g reiwrt uf ri.'ereu tu bu llkd, J. M. LangaJorf tic 1'. J. Kiltel & Co, mi motion of Milliards, llolap A lliirtou, order for Judgment on rrrt of referee. |