Show trial of emerson Ems according to the trial of jack or john commenced on monday 1 1 0 morning ora g it it will III ba r ro me monib b ered d tant at ill abo j 1 U clar charged I 1 wh with complicity om I 1 icicy in the dr ajohn I 1 ill the accomplice fred welcome or hopt san under Be atenci of death in the ho salt A ja lake city jail 1 ISi n narson was brought from tho the aorl it till ar nry I 1 into arvio to court a little before 10 Assi assistant tant district attorney J 11 reatty I 1 n P presented r B 0 1 te d the ile 1 a BUU and ll essra M E 1 D e I 1 F vi a I 1 1 8 alia t ile do ion dant counsel for the iha pr lioner stated to the court con susn 0 i lure to appear of some important they the iba sity of baking asking for sl a postponement I 1 until they hey t could bo be brought by y legal procopi id lulu c earl court the I 1 I 1 oble til d to a 0 pe orriena or rient tied the ilia court that the furors juron were all and all but two or tareo of the v fur tho the prosecution were also lw in they wished to lo proceed with thol cue chii and while walla the iha empen ailing of the jury was in pro pr orreis those ot of who process lia had not so DO far put in an all appearance could bu be biou clit into c out cut ut through 1 regularly issued bev altac ments zur tur explained that they lind not akiji a kud for it continuance but lim in alch tu to obtain their witnesses to put defenda or ti antal fill wi wih h hl ahli mt inott important biant would be ba doing libut in and it wan fundamental tulo rule of law that every advant aa should bo be given a prisoner charged as a their client chant win vas with fill 10 gra 0 an 01 olli lance ince as ai murder it u however r stipulated between counsel that tha he cao aft o should commence on t the h 8 f following 1 morning and that attachments ifould be immediately issued lor for the appearance ol of the wil judge Ilu titer thereupon granted a pout pon emont until the following morning and gavoor order ders for tile iho issuance B of tile the attach merits menti te lc the iho salt lane laite af af in court resumed at 10 a an ni april alth it i that returns had not been made in tho the matter of tile hie attachments ordered orile rei the court nd a further postponement until 2 in the A afternoon after fter defendants counsel offered a motion molion for H continuance till next term for the reason that three important wit nesme ald lind yet flit failed to appear after argument menta on be bogli sides li IX hours the court stated slated that in big opinion tile points po rits to bo be proven proton by ilie hie aliment witness ei were very erial and aad that he folt felt bound to grant brant tile the motion |