Show tho verdict of the jury antho citon IN case does not to impress itself altogether very well with the press of fails to meet public approval tho san francisco examiner va commenting on tho verdict very logically says and who ha e been condemned to imprisonment for life aro either guilty of a do liberate premeditated murder or they are not there 13 no halfway half way ground if guilty their crime demands hanging if innocent they should bo dis di aryed but eubence produced on the trial nas entirely circumstantial it probably struck the jury as almost conclude conc lume but not quite upon the slight element of doubt concerning the facts v as based the difference between the death penalty and imprisonment for life it is likely that alie jury reelect cd that there might be a bare possibility of alio discovery of new evidence in case the wone done an imprisoned min could be rectified hile hanging be irrevocable ho ia a devout presbyterian eust ha e bel cd all defendants fend ants innocent since iCo ted to acquit them finally lie agreed to con damn three of ahem to imprisonment for life and another to imprisonment for three years does lie still them innocent and if so what does lie of himself |