Show DIVORCE MILL GRINDING Three Complaints Uiled in District Court Yesterday Three divorce actions were commenced In the District court yesterday two of the plaintiffs being wives and one an Irate I husband Infidelity Is tho charge made I by Joseph Watson ngtiinst his better half Kllzabelh Watson whom he accuses of hnving been unfaithful I They were married mar-ried at Mantua Ala October J7 IbOT and later lived In Pueblo Colo at which place tho defendant is now alleged to be violating her marriage vows The name of the paramour Is not given I Mavbelle McCnlloch is suing Harry Mc Culloch for a divorce on the ground of nonsupport The couple Intermarried at Asnen Colo December 21 S03 and the defendant Is alleged to have wilfully failed to provide the plaintiff with the common neecssaries of life since June 1000 The plalntllf isks to ha restored to h > r maiden name of Mabclle Til rat Walter Afford Ja made Ito defendant In the milt of Ilattle I 1 Afford who desires to be restored to single blessedness and her lormer name of Ilattli While Desertion and nonsupport aro the I grounds upon which HID I decree of divorce Is sought The plaintiff I and dufondnnt inlermairlecl In October 1S07 Court ITotes S The jury In the case of Thomas M Alnop vs D O RidoosH Jr et Ill which has been on trial before Judge Stewart brought In a i verdict ycbterday finding the IhfUT III favor of the jlnii tiff and assessing as-sessing his damages at 10 C5 The defendant defend-ant HliJcout was alleged to have fur nlshed the wanes of Alaoy for money owing to him by another laborer by the same name as this plaintiff In the case of C V Cromar vs X 13 Mldgloy Judge Lewis yeutordav entered Judgment 1 III favor of the plaintiff for s TJ Judgment 1 against Ito I dufendant In them the-m of the Paelllc Feed Mills vs David l Crowther was entcied for < 2iil3 by Judge Lewis yesterday Judge Stewart yemeiday entered Judgment Judg-ment I In favor of the defendant for SJTIO I In the ciisc of the Utah Foundry Ma fhine company vt James II Uornsley I Provo Brick rompanV Karnlshce The Judgment la agUnst tho garnishes In fn S for of the dctl1Itlnnt for the use of the plaintiff I S Itluhiml Howe filed a complaint In tin District court yeotcrday agalnat Isaau Scars et nl asking for perpetuation oC a I judgment for S2SPS 12 rendered in favor of the plaintiff ajjalnst lie I delendunls October Octo-ber 11 iS9i Inierst at the u mIl of S percent per-cent pCI annum from the above date is ali0 asked Joseph Hal nap bioighl suit In the District Dis-trict court yesterday against J J Daynes lo iicovcr on IL check for 12Ti alleged to u have been given by the defondnnt on Mvy Lo 1003 The bomphilnl reciUs that I he Check wasi made payable lo JI J Chllda null Intn r tranaferred I by him to the above plaintiff When the check was presented to the Slate Bank of Utah upon whleh house It was drawn It ia I said that II was I protested |