OCR Text |
Show beck; W. F. Wiscombe vs. Tintlc Range Railway company. . January 5 Jane B. Crouse vs. Henry Crouse. January 6 Joseph F. Wright et al. vs. William Brough; Gastaf Wiedmark vs. P. V. Coal company. January 7 Sylvester Osborne vs. American Ameri-can Fork Consolidated Gold and Silver Mining Min-ing company; 8. S. Cluff vs. Provo City. PASSED. The following cases were passed for the term : George C. Whlttemore vs. William Leonard Leon-ard et al. W. C. Burrows vs. O. G. Kimball. Anna M. Moore vs. Sarah Morgan et aL F. J. Kiesel & Co. vs. II. F. Gear et al. Territory of Utah vs. A. O. Smoot, 1r., etal ' Caroline Waters, guardian ad litem vs. Rio Grsnde Western Railway company. Geoi rr E. Darla vs. Rio Grande Western Railway company. Isaac Woolf vs. J. E. Bamberger et al. (three cases.) Carey Bros A Co. vs. J. 8. Black. E. A. Davidson et al. vs. T. C. Rooklldge et al. KOTES AND PERSONALS. R. H. Dodd returned from the Indian territory ter-ritory last Sunday bringing with him his son, Dallas Dodd, who is suffering from a severe attack of typhoid malaria. He was very sick when he and his father started for Utah, but has Improved on the trip and is now in a fair way to recover. The wedding of Miss Eleanor Nuttall and Mr. M. M. Warner wi:i take place this evening even-ing at the residence of the bride's parents. Miss Nuttall is a most estimable young lady, the daughter of Mr. and Mr. L. John Nuttall, Nut-tall, and Mr. Warner is a rising young attorney attor-ney who has mado many friends since his arrival in Provo abont a year ago from Colorado. Colo-rado. The Baptist association of Utah and southern south-ern Idaho will hold their annual meeting here on Wednesday and Thursday, the 16th and 17th inst. . PROVO COURT. Trials, Convictions, Cases Set and Cases V Passed Notes and Os. VProvo, Nov. - 3. Special. The First district court held a short session yesterday and transacted the following business: In the case of the Mammoth Mining Co. vs. Juab county, judgment was rendered for defendant; exception taken by plaintiff. This suit was brought by the mining company com-pany to compel the county to return taxes collected on the machinery and Improve-menta Improve-menta on the Mammoth mine In Tintlc. The taxes were paid under protest, tho mining company claiming exemption under the law exempting mines and mining claims. In case of Daisy J. Kinsman vs. the Rio Grande Western Railwsy Co., demurrer to amended complaint sustained, and' ten days given to amend. The following (sentences were passed on violators of the law convicted during the term: Berg Larsen, unlawful cohabitation, one month's imprisonment In the penitentiary peniten-tiary and costs of prosecution. August Bwenson, adultery, one year's Im-prisonmeDt Im-prisonmeDt in the penitentiary and costs of prosecution. John Oh berg, adultery, six months' imprisonment im-prisonment in the penitentiary and costs of prosecution. German Ellsworth, unlawful cohabitation, one month's imprisonment in the penitentiary peniten-tiary and costs of prosecution. James Anderson, unlawful cohabitation, one month's imprisonment in the penitentiary peniten-tiary and $50 fine. Anton Nlelson, adultery, three months' imprisonment in the penitentiary and costs of prosecution. Jacob' Allertson, unlawful cohabitation, two months' imprisonmeat in the penitentiary peniten-tiary and costs of prosecution. Deputy Marshal Bachman took the prisoners prison-ers to Bait Lake City in the afternoon. Tbe accounts of Ed Pike, United States commissioner at Eureka, was, upon motion of Mr. Vivian, approved. The case of the People vs. W. E. Davis, was set for December 17 and an order mads for an open venire, returnable on the 17tb, for thirty Jurors to be issued. SIT FOR TRIA1 The following cases were set for trial for the November term : December 21 Christens J. Peterson vs. Joseph Walton et al. ; Christens J. Peterson vs. John Walk ins et al. December 22 Union Pacific Railway company vs. Rio Grande Western Kail way company: Consolidated Implement company vs. J. A. De Valley. December 23 First National bank of Fro vo vs. North American Asphalt company. James Rooney vs. Lester Taylor. December 24 James Chipman et al. vs. Henry W. Owen et al. December 26 John McChrystal et al. vs Oscar Gunkel (two cases); C. H. Blanchard vs. North American Asphalt Co. December 27 Frank . McHatton et al. vs. Dennis Sullivan etal.; Gibson & Smurth-waite Smurth-waite vs. Lake Shore Co-op. Institute. December 2S George W. Mickcl & Co. vs. B. A. Stringham; Hugh Kilkenny vs. J. H. Rogers et al. j December 29 Jsmes Thompson vs. P.J. Stewart et al.; J. T. Haskins vs. John H. j McCrystal (two cases). I December 30 Gemini Minlny company vs. John Beck; Kinr A Houtz vs. Wllliaiu II. Patten; E. J. McCune vs. William H. Fatten. December 81 John O. Bwensoa vs. John Gay. (January 2,1893 Levi Ironsky vs. Anna Jfarks; Lorenzo Tacel al. vs. George C. WViltmore. i&Jj lanuary 3 Payson Canning; and Creamery ccinpany vs. W. L. Clark; James Caipman . vsAlIyrum Anderson. V Jknuary 4 Charles Foote vs. John yvit- ) ? M |