OCR Text |
Show THE SALT LAKE LAND CASE. A lierUInn liy Hi" Heereinry nf li" lmr or In I'uviir t ! I rlrnl r.ieilte. M'asiiim.ios. Il l The secretary of the interior has rendered a di-i-ion hi j thoappealoflbeCeiilr.il I'.u iiie 11 til j road company in the ease nf that cor- poratioii against John Taylor and James Wndiiiaii, The decision win rendered bv Commitsioner Sparks in 1SH7, rejecting th" claim ( f the company com-pany lo the south half of the northeast quarter and lots I and 2 of section township II north, range '2 vvcM, In the Suit Lake CilV district. Sparks do-cid.'d do-cid.'d in f n or of 'I avlor ami M adman. The tracts are within the grant of he company under the net of July 1. ti!. enlarged July 2. 1H. and th- n..it attached on d-liiiile location October SO, IK . . The ecretary holds that under th precede. its be " is compelled to dec, do that, as W adman did not declare thai his claim is not sullii lent lo except the I tract from the operation of the grant, j conn.-plentlv h decided in favor of the j company. A similar decis-on, iiivo v- j I ine almost the same poiiitu in Colorado, j j was decided y.-ilerday in favor of the -: I'uion I'acilic. |