Show we do not belleve believe that tho the decision dc llon if if judge judee Gb gabbert bert of telluride colo cola will stand he holds that the owners owner of a quartz mill n ih cannot permit the tha tailings to run ran into it a dream atonal to the detriment of those thoe living on oil tile alie stream lower down we bellove that the supreme court on the grounds of 0 public policy will re verse acre that decision from rom the fact t that h at the Bo vereen entert in colorado Is mining and that it must not to be crippled slid nd further ahat such practice has been in vogue under the por permission mission of the law no 0 it would be wrong arons now to interpose a new rut rule it is not like the law restricting hydraulic mining in california becque there such euch immense quantities of debris were discharged c in rivers rivera that their beds were elevated many feet ret and ill all the lower country the great arri agricultural cultural valleys were jeopardized as as a the bay of san franesco Fran elco the tailings front from a quartz mill are different and we dl do 0 not believe that the ground on which the e injunction tOn was sought was a fair filar on one eb because because the tailings of a quartz mill with the waters of a air stream earn does not reduce the power of that water in the least |