Show LATEST MINING DECISIONS prepared for the mining review by westervelt thompson attorneys salt lake city antedating ante dating notice of location fraud evidence in an action to determine ownership andric and right to possession of certain mining ground evidence ol oi statements of one of several plaintiffs as to the antedating ante dating by him of the location notice made in the absence of his plaintiff co and not concurred in by them is hearsay and inadmissible to bind them fraud when relied upon as a defense must be specifically pleaded in an answer answerus as well as in a complaint and where fraud in making a mining location is not charged in in the answer evidence of the admissions and declarations of the locator in relation to such location tending to show fraud on his part is inadmissible where the locator of a mining claim on government land fraudulently antedates ante dates his notice of location for the purpose of defeating an actual locator thereon such location is fraudulent as against such rightful claimant and is also fraudulent as against the government the date of the location required to be given in the notice means the correct date and not a fraudulent or fictitious date muldoon vs brown 59 pac utah mechanics lien ouster where one unlawfully ousts busts the owner from mining claims and in working the same creates debts such debts are not legal claims for liens against the mining claims idaho gold minler mining co vs winchell 59 pac idaho |