Show OFfER DENIAL spirited Answer Filed In Suit Brought roUght by St Joe C Co stockholders BAD BD FAITH IS ALLEGED IN COMPLAINT TAKEN AKEN UP IN DETAIL AD answer was wa fIl filed In tile the court by the defendants in a suit j about a week ago by Ellen Gare Garey J W v Snell nelI W V IL Morgan Hyrum Mor McCarthy Mary E Williams I ad Airs Mr Charles Rose Roso against the St Jot Joe Mining company R It A Hasbrouck w cv S Burton Durton D H T A t w V VI I Mento nto and Y I R It Burton In the bill ot o complaint It was alleged certain of the defendants were ner act acting ing fl as tors and officers of the corn com paCY without brIng dul duly qualified 10 rf this tIle tb answer It Is that saId Barton Is net act 11 wIthout qualified as such dl 11 or that Pid d Burton have hav b held ld office th ot of the corporation and I d hit Ment has oN n a dl di lOOt oot and said Wenger since J t nd that the last n defendant r he and tK Ii th tho adviser r or oC saId and Burton as of or of the corporation and andas as been sin 1901 and that all times 1 ha had nd now has an knowledge tor If all sil the affairs pt pertaining to the man and direction of said corpora Ion Admit that the plaintiffs herein ex exI x I Ung the plaintiff J 3 M Morgan are owning and holding ruu fulI paid up shares ot of the capital stoc of saM 1 corporation Deny Owning Control D nY that thai the defendants Hasbrouck Burton Burton and Mento own or r kaYo havo control of a ot the cap stock or that In an any manner thc they or control said corporation or 2 policy excepting through th action of r the who b by virtue or of shares have hat placed them tn In Lion on of directors ot of said corporation and Who b by giving to their proxIes en enable n able ble them to control Maid nd ad admit mit t th that t tim tho said directors have e call dor t Ud can call D a meeting of saId stockholders T publIcation AS an stated In the tho complaint t tOto the th of nt amending the if t Incorporation and further alleges on n the tho day of oC February 1907 nd prIor to the services ot of summons or restraIning order In this ne nc lion tion and by vote vole e or of til the U and out outstanding capital r tock toek did amend the articles of so as to make the 1 stock ore f assessable to the pleasure of the theIn oard of oC directors In the matter ot of b bylaws the complaint lIegos that there ther are In existence certain 10 oI bylaws laws to which the answer says Deny that there are now or since the mst 1st day dy or of December 1901 1001 there have Reen In existence any bylaws of the tho eor cor Uon and further allege t that the said Ellen Girey Garey who Is the prIn prinI t I I 1 herein was herself at i the time said b bylaws were adopted n a of the board or of directors and I j In and to the lion ot of the same Books Open for Inspection It Is in tit the complaint that the 8 have not had 1111 Ithe e and privileges S ot of stockholders hit not had full opportunity to in pett tin books and minutes of the hie cor i To this the tho answer says 1 nv that there thore has not been since organization Uon of saId company compan an any lull full of oC the transactions ot of its rs or any accounting for the mon bys bs received b by them tn In trust for the or for trust funds but oi the allege allese that at an all tImo the M havo as stated hed full opportunity to examine und and audit Lh of the corporation and par allege that In the year car 1903 on r 9 11 at the tho annual meeting of or of the corporation the thc following proceedings took place It was wa mop h hi J 3 W Yo and seconded by bJ J ir carey husband Cr f the tho plaintiff herein that a committee b be appointed to audit th the books of the company compan and the or of the tho and treasurer the of Much examination to be paid br b thE compan Accordingly the to fooks and report were by competent who in their findings stated that the books and ports were correct to October 31 Fraud Is Denied The 1 df deny that the they have In nv ity WILY entered Into any fraudulent with to the sale of oC treasury stock or for their Interests whatsoever It Js Is stat Id ru In th answer anser all stock that has been bee has b been en with the fun full knowledge or of the plaintiff stockholders and sd that 11 saltS or of stock are a matter of recerd rd It is il deol 1 that the tho defendants fully un allowed to Mente the sum suni or of nr r an any other sum whatsoever as travel In X to attend n a board meeting u In Salt Sait Lake Lalta City as alle alleged d b by the tho plaintiffs or that iny stock was was to Monte Mente It Is also denied donled that or tiny ny or Of his assocIates fraudulently managed the affair or the corporation or have unlawfully at the expense or of the corpora I the liTh Tb defendants don deny that the tho ca cali h In e company compy treasury has ms been charged with th expenditure or of oh account rf If the purChase or of th the Fire mining claim or that there is any false entry In therewith The deny that the company I I insolvent or that thc they have I or given away any mone moneys s and liege that the company has beep been man the flie With and fidelity and that stOckholders have been notified from tim D to time by and letters lotters no them or of tho Plans and purposes o Sr th t he company compan It J Curth further r denied d nied that the defendants any desire to either olther secrete or troy an any of fr th the books or accounts 1 r vOUchers of the com company pan or that there any danger that such books or papers will be De mAde away Iway with wit Refer to Previous Suit Ai to the operating or of the mine the stat s These defendants allege that the same the not being Operated to the tho ext nt At that directors and desire tim tho Ihor to bo Operated for the reason that fh b bart art to 0 0 no DO more funds on hand with ith pay for tor the J In same conclusion In answer to the plain The A It t Is stated in defendants allege that this no nc ncr r Or the not brou brought ht In good faith but f trin j ot of hampering and Inter dIrecto I th the plans of the board of h holders ers In dol the of the stock financing the same and car Wt on Its It work that this action Is IsI i to U as these I r defendants are well n the and b believe lh e b by parties other rl Plaintiffs herein who are arc un to ett the e corporation and that this tenor rl S being 1 ng prosecuted for Cor un an 1 on n a Purpose hse that the said plaintiff El EI EIn n r the e principal complainant here ut lt against n the year 1901 brought hi S d and an unfound to relief e action in which she sought Bought the be matte on oa account or many ol of om things set forth ill In tIlls this an and t that at trial th the same m upon action C O l wan abandoned o ed by her and the thc y ref refer S ana an the defendants I r the thc flies tue r to and an part of this g action and Sn In said fluid Sal saInt nt Jo or Ellen Garey agaInst the th cOmpan and othen |