Show TO REFORM AGREEMENT Action Instituted to Straighten Out Alleged Misunderstanding An action was brought in the district court yesterday by W M 1 Rash and the company against the time H II III HI HL I L Griffin company compan The prayer of the plaintiff Is that an agreement entered into between the two Interests now nor par parties parties parties ties to the th action be construed or re reformed reformed reformed formed as to render Its meaning in ac accordance accordance accordance with that which the plaintiff says It was intended to mean Last January the plaintiff and the de do defendant defendant it is alleged entered into an agreement whereby the thc Griffin company compan in consideration of should refrain from Crom buying selling or soliciting orders for fruit grown in Bannock county count Ida Illa IllaSo So worded was the document that the Griffin company evidently thought that the company compan was the ex excluded excluded eluded party part and therefore went ahead with its business There is now a suit pending In the Idaho courts to prevent the plaintiff in the present case from do doing doIng dolog ing log the tile business in Bannock county count to which particular reference Is made The plaintiffs In this case deny the right of the defendants to sue and ask uk that they be given the right to sell In Bannock ty and a good many more things of similar nature S |