Show ANOTHER BRIEF BY MUTUAL LIFE Technical Reasons Why Peti Petition Petition Petition tion of Policy Holders Should Not Be Granted New York Aug 4 The Mutual Life Insurance In Insurance company today announced that a supplemental brief has been filed tiled with Su Supreme Supreme Supreme preme Court Justice Howard of Troy in intha inthe Inthe the tha matter of the international policy policyholders policyholders holders hoders committees motion to compel the tho state superintendent of ot insurance to re remove remove remove move from the administrative ticket for forthe forthe forthe the election eJection of the Mutual Life the names ames of four men on the request of Alfred I ISnook Snook one of the four About a month ago the Mutual made public the names of ot candidates to be voted upon next month It was found that the list contained the names of ot four tour men on the tho policyhOlders committee who never I agreed to be candidates and it was that these four names be stricken from the irie ballot that hat the motion before Judge How Howard Howard Howand ard and was made Points in the Brief The supplementary brief says in part The Tle management of the Mutual Life Insurance company compan and the board of t trustees responsible for what is termed the tho administration ad ticket do not wish or seek to hold the relator or any of the theother theother other three for whom it Is claimed that lie ho is acting as candidates upon the ad administration administration administration ministration ticket against their will It Itis Itis ItIs is necessary however and respondent in insists insists that such proceedings as is had hadin tin in inthe the matter of ot the nomination and elec dee election election deetion tion of at trustees of the tho Mutual Life be had in a legal and orderly manner Tho The relator has not proceeded in an orderly manner and his application should therefore be denied He has sought recourse to the tho court in i mandamus rna damus pro proceedings proceedings proceedings and the court cannot grant a peremptory writ Technical Reasons The relators papers fail to show that any declination of nomination was ever made or filed with the superintendent of at insurance the board of trustees of the Mutual Life or that notice of declination was ever filed with the trustees the sec secretary rotary of the company or with any anyone one Even if there were power under the law I W to remove the names from the list filed we urge that as a foundation for tor foran toran foran an an application n in mandamus they should show that they had made a demand of the of insurance or of the proper proper officers of ot the tho life Ufe insurance com company patty pany that the names be stricken from the certificate of at nomination The moy moving movIng ing papers do not disclose that any de cje demand demand mand was ever mado mada of the superintendent dent of at insurance either before or after a a formal declination |