| Show CASES IN FEDERAL FEDER L COURT Number of Actions Are Subject to toI I Call Next ext Monday Next Monday will be rule day In the federal court and a number of cases are subject to call These are Lawson Law Lawson son FOn vs United States Mining company Telluride company vs City of Provo United States Mining company vs Lawson Kroupa vs VB American Ozo United States vs Uintah River Irrigation company Raft River vs Lind et al United States vs Dry Gulch company Griffith vs Garfield Water company Shelly vs 13 Utah Gas Coke company Richards vs Union Pacific Tracy vs Union Pacific Erick Erickson Erickson son oon vs Utah Consolidated Mining lIning com company company company pany Affleck vs s Virgin River com company company company pany Ehrbar vs Salt Lake Tribune Mitchell vs United States Smelting company comp y Lucic Lucie vs Southern Pacific United Unite States vs Union Pacific Coal company United States vs s Schulte Sampson vs VB United States Mining company Clawson vs Van Orden Morgan vs Van Orden Herschel vs Bothwell MUIr Miller vs Utah Consolidated ed vs Bothwell Millers Miller Vs so Utah Consolidated Centen vs ys Stone v vs VI Utah U h Fuel company Bateman vs YS Utah Consolidated Gill vs Union Upion Pacific railroad Williams Vm ami vs VB Smith et al vs ls s United Smelting com company company company pany Anderson vs Promontory ranch United States vs Moore United States vs VB Payne United States vs Oregon Short Line railway Bankruptcy mat matters matters matters Frisbey and Buter Butler |