Show MOSS VERDICT TOO LIGHT Jurors Expected Their Finding Would V QuId Send Rim Hint to State Prison It H has now developed that the verdict of the jury jUI In the ease case of f Harry Moss Mo charged with wih manslaughter was not such as KS some Bore of or the jurors intended to ren render render der and would not have rendered if I they had fully understood the effect It I was I stated yesterday that the the verdict really agreed aref upon was one of or voluntary man manslaughter mun manslaughter slaughter slaught r but that instead the jurors by b some mistake signed signe a verdict of in involuntary involuntary voluntary manslaughter This however was wag wa disputed by one of the time jurors Juron who said Ild that on the first rat ballot blot every vote was for conviction of an offense In some degree The jurors understood that they thy were rendering a verdict one degree less les in severity than the offense ofen charged and such Much a verdict they then did render There Timers Therewa was wa however a misapprehension in the Ule minds of some om of or the t jurors as to the to be b meted out to the de do de under the verdict rendered They The thought that under tinder it i the defendant could be 1 sent to the state prison under the verdict that they Uly were rendering but a aa us usa as asa a fat the severest ev ret punishment that can be b imposed imp is a year ear in the county count jail jai |