Show BURNS ON THE STAND Doyle Contradicted All the Way Through t num il l Blurts Blum la a March 30 In the I mining suit stilt today James E K Kl l urns the defendant narrated the i C nit w which preceded pr ded the time discovery overy of M Id on the Portland and amid Bobtail No o 2 t daim lIe He said Doyle the tho plaintiff J offered to work for fOl him because be au Doyle Do le J I lad ad nothing else ItIC to do After Doyle Dole to Colorado Springs Burns imd rund gold on one claim and John Johll Har ni 1 on om the other Harnan H wa then t L third interest in the Portland hough the Portland was isas Partnership partner hip r pity Burns Burna said aid he Ime himself paid I iv P 1 of patenting I it and Harnan i ight material to build a shaft sha it ho hous us p inI I Doyle Doyl contributed no money I Much MUrIL of or the evidence given ghen by Burns Burmis I IL L contradictory of statements made ho ihy Doyle on the witness stand ten days go Burns declared he never advised Dovle Ivle to give perjured testimony in the 1 rado case ease of vs S Burns Burmis He aIo ho said aid he be never authorized Doyle Do le or m 11 one lilt else to dig up p the Portland claim stake ke and did not learn that this I done one until some sonic time afterward Burns testified te that he found that O intended bringing ing suit uit against a Doyle Dovle as well as against himself hir lf and that flint ho he h went to tell Doyle about aboul It The flie latter Iatter then put most inot of his stock it ft Burns name to protect it Burns Burn immediately transferred it to Kate Burns Burn hia his sister Ister as aa trustee tru The divi divid d nd nl checks were sent to her and she mt them to Doyle a as indorsements o on the tho th hocks hecks show When Vh n Doyle settled 8 tt led his Ills case with Burns Burn said lie he paid over 0 1 the Ute he had held on some other sto stock k he had been holding for fOl Doyle Dole At t that time the tho witness said Doyle lid nut not tl lt make a demand for any stock |