Show BURNS ON THE STAND Doyle Contradicted All the Way Through Bluff la March 30 In the mining suit stilt today Tames James E K the defendant narrated the th tnt which preceded pl ded the dit discovery of M 11 on the Portland and Bobtail No Xo 2 Z Jaim daim lIe He said Doyle Dolc the plaintiff offered to work for him because Doyle A ad lad nothing else Ise to tu do 10 After fter Doyle Do Je Jer r turned to Colorado Springs Burns und rund gold on one claim and John liar Ilar in 1 on OIL the other r wa Was then thenh h icu 01 A I third interest in Iii the Portland the was partnership PIt Burns said he himself paid a id idt th t h expense of patenting it and und Harnan material to build a shaft house hi hulo I Doyle loyle contributed no money Much of the evidence given by b Burns Burn wu sas cl contradictory of statements made 1 h b Doyle on the witness stand ten days dS M go gf Burns declared he never advised yle to give perjured testimony in the lorado case ease of vs 8 Burns He Heas alo as said aid he never authorized Doyle Do le or 01 one no else Co to dig up the Portland stake and did not learn that this vis 1 done until some time afterward Burns testified that he found that O Haiie Oltaire mended intended bringing suit against Doyle I n Ic as well wen as against himself and he h went to tell Doyle about it The rh latter then put most moat of his stock in t 1 Burns name to protect it Burns Burn immediately transferred tran 1 it to Kate Burns Burn his sister as trustee The divi divid d dr di nil ml checks were sent nt to her Iter and she sheo v o nt theta them to Doyle as indorsements on the c hOcks hecks show When Doyle settled his Ills case with Burns Burn ald he lie paid over the di divi he be had held on some other tolk toek he had bad been holding for fot Doyle At that time the Ull witness said Doyle did not make a demand for any au stock |