OCR Text |
Show I COURT CALENDAR. 'i i l .va l!t it null l,f uikfii up for ; Hici. o. J,r the Srptimlxr Jeimnfli,,- Third District Court. Nolice, lo the attorneys and parties interested, is hereby given, that owing ow-ing to tho necessary absence of the Unihd Stati a attorney, the United ritnt"n' ruBcf, and the criminal cases, M:t for tho September term will not. bo called tor trial until further notice1 is given; but on tho first day of the i September term, we will commence the call of the civil docket lor trial; and the cases will bo called according to the tr-rm number as published hflnw. It is desired that all enses may be dinposed of as they are called in order. Attorneys- will ploase see thai the parlies and witnesses will be ready and in altendnnco when their cases are called. M. Rciiakffkb, Judge Third Disl. Court. 201 P. K. Firman, asignee, vs. Buel tt Ihiteir.an; Marshall & Koyle; Mi nnctt & Whitnev. I 202 W. G. Galligher ct d. vs John Tiernan tt al.; Bask'ui it De-Wolfe; W. 0. Hall. 20:1 August Caziux vs. Stephen W. Taylor et al..; Whitney & Kimball; 'A. Snow. 01 Isaac Roland r. Harmon Gray ft al.; Robertson .t Mcliride; Gilchrist, Slieeks & Rawlins. 20o J.hn L. Baldwin et al. vs. I lira m B. Clawson el d. ; William Hiiydon; McKean, Shceks & Rawlins. 206 John L. Baldwin el al. vs. Hiram R. Clawson el al.; Wiiliam Haydon; Sheeks & Ratlins. 2,17 John Tiernau vs. W. G. Gak li hrr: W. C. Hall; Baakin & DeWolfe. 208 John L. Baldwin et al. vs. John W. Goldlhait et al.; William ! llaydon; UcKoan, Brown, Shecka &, j Rawlins ! 2I)9-Ji,hn L. Baldwin et al. vs. jjcihn W. Goldlhait, et at.; William Haydon; McKean, Sheeks A Rawlins. 210-B. M. DuRell d at. vs. Farley B. Granger; Hempstead & Gamble; Williams & Young. 211 Isaac Roland vs. John W. Goldlhait etal.; Robertson & McBride; Gilchrist, Williams ifc Young ct al. I oiorl-iriiniJP Knllivnn m. Wnlls. Fargo & Co.: Woods & Gee; Marshall & Koyle. 213 Geo. E. Whitnoy vs. Isaac S. Waterman; in person; Rosborough it Merrill. 214 Stephen F. Nuchol's vs. Warren War-ren Hussny d al.; C. V. Bennett; Til ford & Hagan. 215 Banks. Peckham &. Co. vs. George Dunlord; Lewis Burues. Hoge A Jonasion. 21G David Cooper vs. K. B. Claw-son, Claw-son, el al.; Robertson & McBride; no attorney. i 217 William Wilson vs. E. C. Chase. No attorneys. ' 218 U. A. Larseu r. H. t N". P. Hanson; no attorney; Kinney it Hofl-, Hofl-, man. 219 James Sewell vs. George- R. Maxwell; J. H. McCnlchen; Tillord fc Hagan. 220 William Wilson vs. Chicago M. ct S. Co.; L. Bcthune; C. K. Gilchrist. Gil-christ. 221 W. O. Smith vs. P. L. Breiger; R. H. Robertson; O. V. Huey. 222 Salt Lake city vs. Wm. Bean; Z. Snow; no attorney. 223 W. Groesbeek vs. G.F.Culmer & Co.; Williams & Young; Zera Snow and J. R. McBride. 224 August Cazaux vs. Heber C. Kimball, et al.; Whitney & Kimball; Williams Youug. 225 J. B. Benedict vs. Thomas Sleater; Dilley it Burmestsr; L. Beth Be-th u no. 220 L. Goldberg et al. vs. J. J. Oreeoall. J. CL. Hemingray; J. N. Kimball. 227 Wm. H. Harlo-v ct ar. rs. o. W. Bennett el at.; HempBtead t Gamble: C. K. Gilchrist. I 22S Wm. H. Harlow et al. rs. C. j W. Bennett et at.; Hempstead it Gamble; C. K. Gilchrist. 229- Wm. H. Harlow et al. vs. C. W. Bennett el al.; Hempstead & Gamble; C. K Gilchrist. 230 Mary Jane Cotton vs. Nelson Seamons; VVoods it Gee; Dillcy it Burmester. - 231 Joel M. Joelsnn vs. Sarah A. iLovell et at.; Lewis Burnrs; Hempstead Hemp-stead it Gamble and Kimball, j 232 E. Stott t- Quejn of tho West S. M. company; no attorney; J. B. McKean 233 Kullman it Armet rs. Hanak &. Co; Lewis Bnrnes; W. W. Woods. 234 Wells, Fargo it Co. vs. Ma-thew Ma-thew T. Gisborn; Marshall it Koyle; Rosborough it Merritt. 235 Lydia M. Waldron vs. Brig-jham Brig-jham Y. Hampton; J. G. Sutherland; Whitney & Kimball. 236 E. C. Wagucr et al. vs. Eim C. Chase etui,; McCnrdy & Lomai; Til-lord Til-lord & Hagan. 237 School District No. 31 vs. James Gordon; Z. Snow; Baskin & De Wolfe. 23S J, Snell et al. vs. Fred Hiams ct al.; J. G. Sutherland; Woods it Gee. 239 Thomas A. Furness vs. James Beus et al.; Dillcy it Burmester; Marshall it Roylo. 210 Chas.W. Conrad rs. Hanak & Co.; Marshall it Royle; Lewis Burnes. 241 J. Pitts el al vs. A. M. Clark et al; Hoydon fc McKean; Lewis Bnrnes. 242 Louis Boukofsky vs. Eoail Boukofsky; Woods & Gee; Morgan it Pat ton. 243 C. II. Morgan vs. A. Tarbet; Tillord it Hagan; J. B. McKean. 244 Josephine Stevenson vs. Frank Hai-Hnn Rihafin' T. A. Kiraball: Haydon it Gibson; L. A. r Brown. , 245 Silas McGuira vs. Harriet Burgess et al.; L. B. Kinney; Frank 1 Hoffman. i 24t) Bernard Snow vs. P. L. Shoaff; no attorneys; Wm. Haydon. 247 H. A. Van Pragg et al. vs. George Chandler el at.; Til ford & Ilagan; Dilley i. Burmester. 248 Salt Lake City vs. John Garrison Gar-rison et al.; Z. Snow; Dilley it Burmester. Bur-mester. 249 rarker, Watson & Co. vs. George Loomia et al.; F. S. Richards; Til ford & Hagan. 250 A.M. Harman vs. Thoa. Show-ell; Show-ell; Dilley & Burmester; R9berteorj & McBrido. . . |