OCR Text |
Show COURT PROCEEDINGS. Supreme Court, McKean, C. J., Emerson, A. J. and Boreman, A J., on the bench. JANUARY TERM FHWT DAY. Monday, January 11, 1S74. Tho supremo court of the territory convened at 1 o'clock yesterday afternoon in the Third district court room, and was cried open by deputy United States marshal Dennison. Tho three federal judges Chief Justice James B. McKean, Associate Justices Phillip H. Emerson and Jacob S. Boreman were on tho bench, and the bar was well represented, about forty attorneys with two or three exceptions, excep-tions, from this district being present. With no unusual coremony the court proceeded directly to the business before it, and the lawyers being reatiy with their causes, everything moved along liko "clock work," without jarring or delay. The manner in which the term begins gives evidence that it will not be of protracted duration. dura-tion. After one or two unimportant ex parte motions were d if posed of, Hon. -Frank Tilford moved lor the admission admis-sion to the bar of Messrs. George W. Spaulding and Harmel Pratt, which was granted. Messrs. George W. Groo and Theodore Burmester wore also admitted to the bar on the respective- motions of Judges Hoge and McBrido. Chief Justice McKean announced that the supreme bench had unanimously unani-mously agreed to limit tho time allowed al-lowed to attorneys for presenting t.hpir fiancca tn nnA hniir an wi side. Tho first caso on the calendar was that ol Greenfield &. Strauss, respondents, respond-ents, V3. Henry Wallace, appellant, on appeal from tho Third District court; Stout & Burmester lor appellant, appel-lant, Marshall & Roylo, for respondents. respond-ents. The appeal was briefly argued by Messrs. Burmester and Marshall for their respective clients, and submitted. submit-ted. Samuel Smith ct al., respondents, ns. Jeremiah M. Richardson el al., appellants; on appeal from the Third district court; Marshall & Royle and McCutchen for appellants, Bennett &. Whitney for respondents. Mr. Bennett made a special appeal to the court for a longer time than one hour in which to present the case, and that being granted he proceeded to read the vary voluminous transcript of the record, a work he had not concluded con-cluded at 4 o'clock when court adjourned ad-journed till 10 o'clock a.m. Tuesday. With the exception of the cases above, the following comprises the complete calendar of the supreme court at the present term: Eelipso Steam Marshall & Koyle Maiifs Co. ( V3. J.S.ichol?,ci al) Bennett & Whitney. Appeal from Sddiatricticourt, A. M. William!, Morgan & McCardy et al. Koberts'ntfcMcBrido v. 'r H. J. Faust. I Williams, Young & ) Sheeke. Appeal from iSd district court. J. M. Cain, et al. -i Bakin to Do Wolf vs. Brigham Young, Williams & Young. ct al. ) Bennett & Whitney Appeal from 3d district court. R.C.Ktevpn 'ft rtM Rinnott. .fc "Whitnav V3, ( Lon Wines, el al. ) J. C. Homingray. Appeal fro-a !ii district court. Enoch P. Martin, j Tilford fc Hagan. ltichard Wnrburton ) Suthorl'nd & Bates Appeal from 3d District Court. L. A. Brown, 1 Tilford & Hagan V3. Thomas Alkin, J Sutherl'nd& Bate Appeal from 3d District Court. J. M. Lynch, i Tilford & Hagan. vs. W- H. Lop. ) Sulhcn'nd & Bates Appeal from Sd Dietrict Curt. II. J ChiiDiborlaio -j Tilford & Hajjau. vs. f J Kowberry and R. Sullierl'nd&Batei Warburton. J Appeal from 3d District Court. Frank K. Seeloy, " Tilford & Hagan. White and Allen. J J. C. Hemingray. Appeal from 3d District Court. Edward Friel i O. LF. Strickland. vs. ' y J. B. Milner. ) E. D. Hogo. Appeal from 1st District Court. H. Thomns and wifo, i J. O. Hemingray. vs. Union Pacific R Co j Hempstea d & iJCirkpatrick. Henry Thomas J. J. Hemingray. vs. Union Pacific R Co fHempitcrid & J Kirkpatrick. Appeal from Sd District Court. Moore vs. Kinooy; appeal from tho First District court. Third District Court, Emerson A. J. Presiding. DECEMBER TERM TWE.STY-SECOSD ! DAI". Court convened at 10 o'clock, a. m. ! Thompson vs. Carson; motion to dissolve the attachment denied. Watterman vs. Daly et al.', demurrer demur-rer overruled. Castro vs. ISohl; demurrer sustained sustain-ed and plaintiff's attorney allowed twenty days in which to amend com-; Walker Brothers vs. Popper et al.; demurrer overruled; defendants allowed al-lowed fifteen days to file answer; de-fondants' de-fondants' attorneys except. F. Auerbach tfc Bro. vs. Lazarus Hoffman; defendant confessed judgment judg-ment for the amount claimed. L. Goldberg & Co. vs. same; same as above. Potter vs. Hussoy ct al.; defendant allowed thirty days in which to file and serve the necessary papers to perfect their appeal, and in the meantimo all proceedings were ordered order-ed stayed. Court adj ourned till 1 o' clock, p. m., January 26th. |