OCR Text |
Show TBIAIi CALENDAR Of canea in the Third district court to bo held at tho Federal court house, Salt Lako city, Utah, Thursday September 20, 1878: 1 George A. Jacknou, vs. B. M., DuKell; Til ford & Hagau; Hempstead Hemp-stead & Gamble, and Bennett. 2 John H. Laty, vs. John W. John son; C. K. Gilchrist, Rosborough & Merritt. 3 Frank J. Hirth et al.; vs. H. B. Clawson et al.; Lomax, Williams & Youug; Sheeka & Rawlins, aud Gilchrist. Gil-christ. 4 Frank J. Hirth et al.; vs. H. B. Clawson ot al.; J. D. Lomax; Shoekt & Rawlins, and Gilchrist. 5 Isaao Roland, va. Hirman Gray et al.; Robertson & McBride; Sheets & Rawlins, and Gilchrist. G B. M. DuRell et al.; vs. Farley B. Granger; Hempstead, Bennett & Harknese; Williams & Youug. 7 Isaac Roland, vs. John W. Goldthwait et al.; Robertson & McBride; Mc-Bride; Gilchrist, Williams & Young. S George W. Kinney, vs. Enoch Reese et al.; Hempstead fe Gamble; F. Til ford. 9 Wells Fargo & Co., vb. M. T. Giaboru; Marshall & Royle; Roa borough & Merritt. 10 O. D. Rohison, vs. Winsor & Randall; Lewis Burnes; Bennett & Hark nets. 11 Wyoming Coal and M. Co. vs. Thomas Waidell; Hempstead & Gamble, and Williams; J. G. Sutherland. Suther-land. 12 Winnamuck S. M. Co. vs. M P.Powell eta!.; Marshall & Royle; Til ford & Hagan. 13 John S. Barnes et al.; va. Chas. F. Hmithet al.; Baskin & De Wolfe; Williams & Young. 14 John N. Whitney, vs. Aladdin G. and 8. M. Co , J. G. Sutherland; Bennett &. Harkueas. 15 Charlea G, Boren vs. Hans Claweon et al.; Marshall & Royle; Z. Snow. 16 R. C. Chambers et al. vs. James Harrington et al.; Bennett & Harkness and Tilford &. Hagan; J. G Sutherland, 17 R. 0. Chambers et al. vp. James Harrington et al.; Bennett fe Harkness and Tilford & Hagan; J. G. Sutherland. IS R. C. Chambers ve. Frederick Reich et al.; Baskin & Do Wolfe, Ben nett & Harkneea. 19 -Latbrop Dunn et al. vs. Frederick Fred-erick Reich et al.; Baskin &. DeWnife; Bennett &, Harkness. 20 James Harrington ot al. vs. R. C. Chambera et al.; J. G. Sutherland; Bennett & Harkness aud Tilford & Hagan. 21 Elirman Kaiser vs. A. Kuhn & Bro.; H. W. 0. Margary and P. L. Williama; E. P. Johnson and Z. Snow. 22 David B. Brunton et al. vs. A. 3. Patrick; Rosborough & Merritt; BaskiD &, DeWolfe. 23 Jamea G. Brown va. John P. Laraon; Baskin & DeWolfe; Rosborough Rosbor-ough & Merritt. 24 Monroe Kling et til. vs. Francis P. Longstrect et al.; Frank Hoflman; S. P. Longstreet. J 25 Erwin Davis vs. Tecoma 8. M. ' Co.; Baskin it Do Wolfe; Benuett & Harkness. . 2G John J. H. Thompson vs. Henry Harris et al ; J. B. McKeau tfc Sou; no attorneys. 27 Mury J. Alexander vs. Monroe Salisbury; Baskin & DeWolfe; Hempstead Hemp-stead & Gamble ar,d G. V. Beuneii. 28 Jacob T. Miller et al. vs. Iris Mining Co. et al; Baskin & DeWolfe; Marshal & Koyie. 29 George C. Bates Vd. William H. Dame; Shecks &. Rawlins; Win, McKay. 30 James McKnigbt va. Samuel Turtibow; J. D. Lomax; A, Miner and Z. Snow. 31 Henry Wada worth (trustee) vs. R. C. Chambers; Marshall & Royle; Bennett & Harkness. 32 Excelsior Manufacturing Co. vs. J. N. Barker; E. P. Johnson and Z. 8now; A. 8. Patterson. 33 Waldio L. Haskin et a), vs. Emma Hill Consolidated Mining Co.; C. P. Huoy; Bennett & HarkneB. 84 Horace B. Cnatlin et al. va. B. M. DuRell eta),; Hoge & Jonasson; Hempstead &, Gamble and Bennett & Harkness. 35 Ferdnan Dickers va. H. Wagner Wag-ner et al.; Gecrge R. Maxwell; Baskin Jc DeWolfe. 3G-FlfiR8tAfTS. M. Co. vs. J. N. H. Patrick; Robertson & McBride and Rosborough &. Merritt; Bennett & Harkness. 37 J. M- Beruhisel vs. Mineral Fork S. M. Co.; . C. Hall; Rosborough Rosbor-ough and Merritt. 38 Jewels B. Francis va. Lewis 8urns et al ; Rosborough & Merritt;, in person. j 39 Richard C Thompson vs. Flag-; etafl S. M. Co.; Bennett d: Harkness; 1 Robertson & McBride ! 40 M. P. Freeman et al. vs. E. N. 1 Williams et al.; E. P. Johnson and Tiilord fc Hagan; Bennett fc Haifc-uess. Haifc-uess. 41 John A. Nt-l-on et al. vs. E. W. Thayer et a!.; Tuford & Hagan; Sutherland & Kimball 42 A. G. Hunter vs. K-ien Tar- I bet et al.; Robertson & McBride; Benuett Ben-uett & Harkness. 43 Charles W. W itsnn vs. Arie ' Pinedo; Tilford & Hm; tiarshtll jot Royle. I 44 Helen Tarbet et al. v. FUg-' stafl S. M. Co.; Bennett fc Hartfin-a.-; Rosborough & Merritt. 45 List Coance S. M C-j. vs. ' Fiagstafl 3. M. Co.; Bennett & Hark : ness; Rsburtsan it McBride. 46 List Caance S. M. :'u. v;. ' Firtgstat S. il. Co.; BenueuJc II irk j t :&-; Robertson & McBride. I 47 3 M.iitee, Hd;un::rtr.-u.jr, v Q : C. aud 0 F. R. U. Co.; W-.) A ; ' Sutherland & Kimball. 48 F. M. Lingford vs G A ii .ji it al.; J. B. Pi!!y; Woods &. Gee. i 49 Jamea W. Campbell vs. J ime-i! J. O'Reilly el al. ; Bennett 4 H.-tt-l uesi and Woods it Ge; liilu.'tl Ji Hagan. 0L)J. p. Wretbcrg et al. vj. Mm-j era! Fork M. Co.; J. D. Lomax; Ho- borough & Merritt. . ' |