Show telephone conversations as evidence 4 in a recent case it was admitted that a telephone conversation had tik tak en place between a representative of 0 the tha plaintiff and the defendant iut dut it was claimed on the part of the he de fondant appellant that each party party to the conversation could testily only to what he said and could not testify to I 1 what he heard through the telephone presumably upon the ground that he might have misunderstood what the other patty party said in declaring this objection untenable the appellate division in the second department pertinently said that such a rule would adroit in it fragments ot of conversation perhaps meaningless and probably tive the conversation that is what one said and the other replied Is the only intelligible and helpful evidence bench and bar |