OCR Text |
Show THAT SUPREME COURT DECISION. DECI-SION. There hxs been prenumte crowing over that division by the supreme court of the l"uu?d States, in the eoe ol Host a Stout, as reported in the press dispatches received on Mouiiv ni.:ht. Several leading lawyers in town h.id doubts of the authenticity of the dispatch, dis-patch, but it was not until yesterday, when a telegram was received from Mr. Hillyer, one of Mr. Stout's counsel at Washington, that the decision wis correctly cor-rectly understood. The disagreement etween the ju.-tiecii of the fiuiTetue j wurt of the I'nitfd St:ib; was upon Le quotiou of jnri-'lieti'ii, and nt ipuu tin; inuritrt of l'Q j'liy qUi.-.-ti'jn. I'lieci-urt divid.j'l up-m tlie prup'i' ion ti to whether the validity of the con-itruuti-iTi of atrandjury ciuU L-j in- , piin.il into at all by Iribiyis corpus; and is to wli'jtluT in any event, an appeal j wnuM lie tu tli': supreme court of th; Uuiled States fpiui the rdVi.-al in grant e i kubras O'Q.ux in acy ui.-c. It is un- '' 'ier-itood, at Wa dtingt-jn, that upun the jury que.iliuii :ven out of tlie tight jiijiliccH W'TC of opinion that in a ca.e cuiiiing Ltf'jrc them properly the rul- 1 ing of tlie .supreme court of L'tah I Wuuld be reversed. It i to he hoped this explanation 'J wili bo gratifying to tbuMJ who gave ruins to their exuberance a little early. |