Show mm CONTINUED STORY I INTO THE BASEXENT OF THE FACTORY NOW Deneen Went After Him Hot and Heavy In lie CrossExamination With But Little Result Chicago Jan 24 Adolph L Luet gerts story of the circumstances surrounding sur-rounding the disappearance of his wit Louisa last May were resumed on ti witness stand today Luetgert explained ex-plained how the stairway door leading to the basement had been blocked aid thus It is alleged excited the suspicion of Bialk the old night watchman who when he returned with Hunjadi wain for which he had been sent said that he could not enter that door and h > made use of the elevator door Exactly as William Charles told the jury Luet gert said the boxes had been mo < d about to give the dogs a chance at toe rats which Infested that part of the basement used as a storage room fur odds and ends You had no intention of blocking thj dor against entrance by any peis n the witness was asked None wnatever the door was seldom used Luetgert to better explain held a plan of the factory before the jut rand r-and elucidated his statements by pointing point-ing out certain spots Now asked the lawyer will you tell me how you provided for youi i > n > during the year prior to May 11 Oh when she wanted money I gavc it to her or she took it from my pocket smilingly answered the prisoner pris-oner Shortly before May 1 just u bun I dont recollect Luetgert contmu 1 she took 20 She knew I would know who had it Did you not kiss Mary Chimmenng often blandly inquired the interrogator interro-gator while Luetgert sat straight in his chair and the spectators looked greatly pleased No I did not came the answer which mode the crowd titter 1 o ud kiss my wife if I wanted to kiss States Attorney Charles S Dnn began the crossexamination of AcLlph L Luetgert at 3 p m today Mr Deneen brushed aside the loner recital of the defendants birth parentage parent-age twin brother boyhood and rise in life and went to the heart of the matter mat-ter piling question upon question regarding re-garding the whereabouts and a < tions of Mr Luetgert during the 12 hours following fol-lowing 340 oclock on Saturday evening even-ing May 1 1S97 To every question designed de-signed to fix the time when anything was done or how long it took to do it the same answer was forthcoming nmr he would not attempt to fix the time The most material advantage ga ped by the state was the wide different in the description of the appearance < > f the vat on Sunday morning as given by I Luetgert and Mr Charles Mr < hues ald the vat contained tallow unassim J ilated grease lye and some soap Luet T gert maintained it was all soapy substance I sub-stance and that the only difference l between the top and bottom was that the former was darker colored and slightly more fluid He realized the importance im-portance of the point and obstmately repeated his answer that it was just soapy substance declining to state what It looked like The crossexamination has only begun be-gun The direct testimony was for the greater part of far less interest than on the former days Mr Luetgrt delivered de-livered his expressed roast of the police and completed the task of denying incriminating in-criminating evidence of various state witnesses The most important feature was his statement that his wedding ring contained no initials when he gave it u > Mrs Luetgert 20 years ago this month He said he never had seen ths rings which are in evidence in this trial until shown them in court |