Show SUIT AGAINST DOOL Y 4 For An Accounting In Rethe Norton Estate t CHARLES DICKENS MINE 4 T IOGEIs OF ITS SAL THE ICA ITM 4 Mrs Edith Tty SueS For Divorce I n Ground of Cruelty and Fail ura to Provide Begun Uyborg Committed to the Reform School General New of the Courts + William J Barrette admlnistratorof the estate of William A Norton deceased de-ceased yesterday med suit against John E Dotily alleging that Vilam A Norton died on July 15 1884 leaving leav-ing a will in which D oly was named as executor On June 20 1884 Norton executed and delivered to Dooly a deed of conveyance to certain lands and mining premises in Idaho under which Dooly took pbsession of the property consideration for the There was no consideraton Iransfel which was made in order that Do01y as assignee might convert the property Into money and pay Nortons debts and Norton at that time was owing 20000 tp Dooly to secure which Norton had given Dooly a mortgage on the Charles Dickens mine in Custer county Idaho At the suit of Dooly thc mortgage was foreclose and R C Chambers bought the property for 52 000 and in making the Iurchase it Is alleged that Mr Chambers acted as the trustee of Dooly as to twothrds interest In the property Dooi1 it is then alleged sold his twothirds interest in-terest to a London syndicate for 6100 000 or more whIch money hc kept I is claimed that as Do01y was trustee under the assignment and under the wi executor tht he should have turned turn-ed the money Over to the estate ex to ceptng the 20OOO which was owing to him Dooly was removal as executor in 1SSG and Joh1 C Fox appointed adminIstrator admin-Istrator and Ddoly was discharged on the representation that l1e had fully executed his trust and that there remained re-mained no property belonging to the estate in his hands I is then alleged that notwithstanding that representation representa-tion there remained property of the estate includidthe proceeds from the ir r g sale bf the minh I in the possession or Dooly which he wrongfully retained and unlawfulyconverted to his own use here are creditors of the estate who the complaint says ought to be paid and the heirs claim the residue This plaintiff on feb 25 last was appointed adminlstrtvr of the estate and he now DrayS that the order of the probate court of May 12 1893 discharging dis-charging DoolYhe set aside that Dooly be compelled toender an accounting and to turn over to the estate whatever what-ever sum may le ound duo it The case of Hamiton YS Dooly which Is very similar to this one was before I the sureme court nearly a year ago and the point was then decided that Mr Dooly being an executor and a I trustee has no right to become a Dur chaser or otherwise of the property at public sale |