Show I WIFE ffAS NOT COM I Refusal of Mrs Frederick to Live I Here Causes n Divorce Suit The < estmon in the dlvorco case or Iaud Frederick was her yesterday Faud FrederIck vms her yesterday I ufternoon by Deputy Clerk Little as referee ref-eree It was aleC by plaintiff that his wife had induce him In the summer of Jb1S to remove from Denver to Salt Lake and that she would jon him later Mrs Frederick the pllntlf complained re fuse to come to him although he regularly regu-larly sent her money for support and to travel on This he maintained constituted consti-tuted desertion and abandonment I Tho testimony was quite contradictory In Its nature Mrs Frederick was represented repre-sented at the hearIng by attorney and sente I had some witnesses in her behalf Referee Little will report the testimony to Judge lilies without recommendation but i Is I probable the plaintiff will withdraw his cmplaint on an Intimation that his wife wilt rejoin him In Salt Lake Frederick and his wife were married at Denver In April 18 Besides desiring a decree of divorce his complaint prays for the custody of the minor child a son aged IZ years half or the time until be 1 rebe Ills majorty |