Show IN JN THE COURTS NO FRAUD INTENDED Judge Hilea Ril Decides Against Jessie I I In the suit brought by Jessie Tessie Mag against F M Bishop John H Hinman and Harvey Harey Hardy before Judge Riles Hiles yesterday the findings and decree were ivere In favor fa or of the defendants Mrs claim was that lila Hin Hinman man nina had embezzled money held In trust for her herThe herThe herThe The pleadings and evidence In the case ease show that on March 12 1391 Ms took a note for tar 1000 sign signed signed ed ed by Bishop Hinman Hardy Hartly Her Ls i that this note was as not for money loaned by her to Hin n or to the lohe firm of which he was a member but was for tor money belonging to her which Hinman or his firm had atten into their thell possession poss Tho The defendants set up that t at by rea rca reason son of or plaintiffs acceptance of the note I and her suit upon It and the obtain obtaining ing lag judgment thereon she waived any fraud that might have theretofore ex existed existed existed isted and is now barred and estopped esto ped trout from asserting that the money was misappropriated approprIated mi or embezzled The de also aloo pleaded the statute of o limitations The court found that the defendants were ware legally and morally bound to pay pa r tho the money loaned leaned to them then by Mrs but that there was no 10 evi evidence dence dance of at embezzlement or misappropriation mIsapproprIation the defendants having be become become become come bankrupt |