| Show j = SUBPOENAS Quoted to Explain i How 1016 LaW Legally Served They are UTAH Feb 7th 1885 juaffosi of THE HERALD i Edior j T ° theEdj Deserct semiweekly the 1 I notice February in 6th an article entitled eWofFebruary rranted Infliction in which Unarranted i an to comments on the some j after and mating stating that the law was not in j < e to ca complied with proceeds tense service anddo the law governing the service dothe I Iaw l JLn4saSafo4ws Quoting from follows j I Iawubpmnas as Wliowo vtuu b ofDS laws of 1884 pageSS sec j ftesffg The service ofage subpoena bon I 1218 bV showing the original and de made by gSSl a copy or ticket l containing 1 f hp s bstance to the witness personally its a copy WIth some suitable or by leaving at the place of his abode giving I I persOD to him at the same time h i or offering f by him the fees to which he 1 deDlanded for travel to and from the i is entitled lated and one days attend I designated m et erenThe service must be made ance allow the witness a reasonable so as to preparation and travel time for of attendance As I understand to the tad dace the Seat article it is intended derstand formation on this important to pie octant to nowadays some s PjSportant understand the situ atleastanil to mislead some of fvervhkelv ation is very causeosomme perso Seto teaders and cause some persons to its into trouble through resisting themselves i get f Vfheleual service of a subpoenaS sistiDg the section qf law quoted by the Now Handset down as the law governing Aftrtanu is taken from ilie Civil cases such Act and does not have any Practice Jearin upon the service of subpoenas criramal case in c in the law I do 110t note any change the service in criminal cases astegards that a witness may be rwrovides which provides for the sumllloned but does not provide Sent of any fees before attendance payment led to believe that ram lIt1l editor overlooked this fact the when writing the article referred to I do not want to be understood as being in JSffi with Commissioner McKay sympathy referred toquite the m the proceeding contrary I consider the proceeding un t in every respect i jU The object of this article is not to find fault but toVentilate a subject of public sufficient to have and importance lc ffiKnpon it to enable witnesses light summoned to know what a legal being them service is thus perhaps saving selves from being m real contempt and Long punished therefor If Commis g p sioner McKay could draw on his imagination im-agination sufficiently to make a con a tempt out of the action of Miss Jessie Grant and was arbitrary enough to fine LerfC = it is hard to tell what it might cost a witness who was really in contempt con-tempt Now Mr Editor I will state in conclusion that lam no lawyer only I this affair have my peculiar ideas about KEVERA |
