Show TTE LITIGANTS WARMING WASHING UP UPI r I 11 B D M N Attorneys Threaten Con Oon Contempt n J tempt Proceeding Against Clancy I Special S ial to The Butte Feb S Contempt proceedings are threatened against Judge Judie Wiliam Willam 4 f I clancy of ot the district x urt ourt by the at attorneys Jo qa for Or the Boston Montana company because of his hi allotted d eon con contemptuous upuN treatment nt of an order made I Iby I b by the ue supreme court in one of t f the nu nus I Im s m injunction suits between F FAugust Fr r 1 August Auguet Heinze a art I l th the company 4 Lat La ondRy the court mod modified Hied Uw te so 80 as to exclude t from it I th big i mineral ral I j veins of ot the l heo o and aud Piccolo mines manN manNi I L i I nd continuing h K a to the Gambetta it 3 Heinz Henz s attorneys took rook advantage of ot t nn n wording of the order of or oft I j t II modification catIn and got Judge f Clancy aney to tOI f I f 1 J 1 the th injunction to tako m jn a 1 t lot lut 1 Gt Gi not m d in tr tl th tilt uit I I Th The mt tout cOu t when ht n ts s at atten ton I I tion lot was caned to the matter pet t ankle I Fudge s injun t oll and amended I JIB If so a as to make the courts co meaning DanIng clear lear v j Today upon uJ the iU n of attorney att rn tIt the Ole t o I order oro still the ime ant anc admitted 1 if f a dispute air lUi to what f the he supreme ourt meant mt ant Judge I f renewed need I the injunction which had been set let by b f the t supreme curl court cour I When Attorney A nom jQ J I t L for the mining company c l pany this evening called I the attention at of at o the U Judge Judee to the he fact that t th l injunction was in eOn con contempt c oo tempt of the supreme mp and in MO vio 10 latton l oC of its it order he iti rt d You 1 I Ican can tn 90 to the supreme court coert or o go else j jh jI h Mr lr Evan informed th judge that j I I proceedings would Je c e instituted j i |