Show JOBBER SWILL Against Prop ed Railroad Ruling in to Carload Carload Car Car- load Local Jobbers will old a meeting next week weel to protes to tho govern SO ment against tho of ot rule 10 of or thu proposed tion No i on which the Interstate commerce Is now holding I hearings according according- t ti If H W. W p. ot tho i bureau in Utah I The Hie proposed rule rulo In part except as otherwise provided when a I number of ot different articles at for Cor which I j carload ratings s or rat ratH are arc provided are arc shipped at ono one b by ono consignor consignor con con- Ij signor to one consignee hid destination In n a carload they will U o chars charged at at I the carload rate to the highest high I est cst classed or or- rated and tho carload minimum wel weigh h will Lo lio tho tho- I hl h st provided for or an any article In the carlond I I Commenting on this I Prick Prick- ett Haa that the rule should be eliminated I ns as It would not lower ur prices but would direct trade of ot th state Wo We tan fall to find tta's the raffle man i where iho tho adoption of iho ho rule rulo will I bo beneficial upon broad lines nes to Utah I as we do not find where I It will I tate merchandising or have hn the effect ct of ot laying down at R J lower louer prIce to the tho consumer than that now obtaining under the present Jobbing I system We 0 do not find that the mixIng mixIng mix mix- Ing of ot cars carswill will tend to lower the cost coat or 01 decrease the rate rato to thu tho merchant Inch naturally will not decrease the tho cost to the consumer If IC rule lule 10 la 18 put Into Inlo effect It will result In putting out of business the local Jobbers in this territory who rr c carry stocks to mee meet the requirements I of oC the merchants In their Immediate I I territory and transfer this business to i eastern rn Jobbers who arc located u a dis tance taneo of or from 1000 to 1500 miles from 1 I tho Utah territory |