Show MAY AY APPEAL TO TOr I HIGHEST COURT r J fc i Constitutional Question to B BRaised Be e Raised by Counsel for Hi Hillstrom 1 om Information has h reached the district dis ds- tract attorneys attorney's office that t counsel for or Joseph Hillstrom rom co convicted cOI slayer of or j J. G G. G Morrison and sentenced l to be executed Frid Friday October 1 I. I proposes to appeal the case to tho the supreme court of or the tho United the Sta States tes I On what ground tho the appeal Is s to be betaken taken Is s not definitely known wn but it ft is s J presumed it will be based on a 3 cons contention con con- s r that the constitutional rights of or Hillstrom were violated when tho court coutt appointed F 13 n. n Scott and I 1 K D. D to Jo continue in lu tho the defense of Hillstrom after Hillstrom discharged discharged dis dis- charged them In open court and ordered them theta from the courtroom Tills This is a a. constitutional point raised In the appeal of or the case caso to the su supreme supreme supreme su- su preme court of ot Utah and it is presumed pre e- e sume lImed t that it is the point on which effort will be made to take the appeal to the tho supreme court of ot tit the United d States Th The court of or Utah ruled rule that the court not only had not violated vio 10 the thc constitutional rights of the lie liei i accused but had prone gone ono out o of Its wa way u to prot protect ct his rights h by requiring that attorneys attorney look after his interests when he in an effort to handle his own open de defense de- de showed that he knew nothing About protecting his own wn interests |