Show THEY SHOWED THE TilE MISSOURIAN Attorney General Hadley Secures Secures Se cures Valuable Admissions From Standard Oil OIlS MR ROGERS ON ON THE STAND Testimony of I P. P Rockefeller Not Ji Not v o Needed o on ii i Main f f L Points of or Cn Cac 1 I New Nt C York 24 In In lin with tho the gerri demand nd of 5 tt to bc hori ho ho ri Herbert S S. tho ful rul ci general of oC the toc to- to c da ct t Henry H. H J executive of the Standard Oil company to admit admi through the trusts trust's lawyers Just what the Ute state of l MissourI anted to 1 regarding c the Stan- Stan lard l control of called so-called independent Therefore Mr 11 Hartley Hadley was waa to be pardoned when at il the conclusion of or the hearing before Commissioner n In this city tod today iy Y ho h cx- cx claimed to the ag assembled newspaper newspapermen mon men T r r have ha got oot all nil I came here for cl Admissions of counsel clear my v way ay f for r lc legal al action I I do lot need the testimony of John D D. Rocke Rocke- Rockefeller Rockefeller feller or 11 1111 any 11 other official of the Standard Stan Stan- dard Oil company en cit the tho points that thet I have ha had ld such difficulty in cleat lug cleat hiS hiS' I q UI up followed the he h examination exam exam- of oC Henry H. H nO Rogers HS during th the of or tho the counsel foi COI am th the Standard Il that the company company owned the th majority of 0 o the of the company It was alMon also alMo n admitted arel owned nod con con- interests ts In the Standard Oil company lc of oC Indiana and the th Republic Oil vII com company pan o-cw o sew York but linac- linac lIy ihl same sama Information was tas giva tl j hn h n a n at a pl previous jou heating hearing In l Il Missouri Mt 11 nn Rogers Is Meek T Today's days day's hearing 4 was marked by j mo most l decided change in iii tho time b Ld and tactics df of Mr Il Rogers Ro Roger r and lj I Ilous counsel At lous he hearings lit lH I J flippant flippant and and con constantly fused en advice of coun counsel col t taits lda the th Jinks J v e IJ tV rn a fot most solemn character Mr Mr Mr i t 11 rs scarcely permitted hlll elf to 3 Turing th the thi- hour h he hI was on tho hr stu sta Mt Not once did he he decline d to answer an William V V. Rowe who t 1 vat sat a at t itt Mr MI r. r J b l i i LA l. l 1 J 0 wn 1 1 ri h h. h rt ll t niJU t D CO 1 I ru t J r t t R lr- lr Ih he be t t. t stimon tn ol vas ns 11 0 on rm ii a t Instead o 0 short hariU hah as the tho tl Standard Oil 01 Sa ia yi-r yi Nt insisted It I should ht h tf tJI k l' l their their- tactics of or delay ClaY h d dho Iho ho- ihlo beginning of if the tho hearing ArI After Mr i Rogers l left t the itt tl stand fi fr if It there thore would be a n. n objection now no noto to taking testimony lr Ii l t time the ordinary wa way The Standard OI 01 01 people I sl signified their s tc to accept the SUA suggestion and the typewriters typewriters type type- writers were crt r removed I O ip Admitted The Time formal statement In which thich the the- admission r regarding tito tho ownership ol of the tH Waters Pierce lel's stock was made madea was wa wasas a aas as us follows Subject ct to tC lh the objection that It I Is immaterial a antI ami 1 3 I t. t it I is ad nd- the of f this case for fat purposes C only emily that now and during during the period covered by b the Information the majority ma ma- jorl of ot the lie stock of o ho Jio Standard OH Oil 01 n of af Indiana and the lw Ut stork stock of or ortho tho Republic 01 Oil company I Is Is- held hold for mba Standard Oil 01 company of oC New ew Jersey and ml O that lt all al the sto stock k of tho the Pierce Waters Oil company standing s on the books hooks of or the company company in the oi name of or N N. N N. Van Buren i is s held for fOl forthe forthe the Standard OH Oil 01 company of New Jer Jer- sey mey y This Is admitted h by all al the tho counsel coun coun- sd sel tel and 1 by all al the 1 respondent com com- This admission was waR drawn up and nd S S. Priest 81 signed b 1 by Former Judge H. H and John D D. Johnson for tor th the Waters Waters- Pierce Oil 01 company and b by Alfred 13 11 l Eddy BlIdy of or Chicago arid amid a d Frank man Haget-man of Kansas City I representing the other t tto o o companies When lh th the first statement state state- m ment of or facts that the company was as willing to 10 submit was made mado by Mr 1 Eddy Ehl- Judge Priest tu a change chango anti and the consultation n of the Standard 0 OH 01 II lawyers lawyer fol followed foll The Tho statement finally prepared by them did not quie quite meet the approval l Mr 11 v tho ho refused to 10 accept I the tw adm admission ISIon unless s It I was waN put in the form in which 11 It J was framed |