OCR Text |
Show The Calender Of the First District Court of Utah. At Provo, lor the February Term, 1891. Cases to bo Tried, Alty's for the Same. Following is the title of cause, names of attorneys, kind of action or pleading, to be passed upon by the court, fur ilie First Judicial District Court of Utah, which convenes at Provo, February 16 i8ji: ' 1 Anna Marks vs Belle ThonipkinsJ L Rawlmgs, Sutherland & Judd, attorneys; motion for new trial. 2 li. D.irger et al vj St. V. Le Sieur; M. M. Kellogg, Arthur Brown, attorneys: motion to relax costs. .1 B. F. Milner vs Geo Needham; Geo. Sutherland, attorney; demurrer to complaint. A John JB. Milner vs Provo Citv; I. W N. WlllterutK.il Can Mll.arl... J. W N. Whitecotton, Geo Sutlierlan ' and VV II King, attorneys; motion to re-tax re-tax costs. 5 Neils S Eliaseh vs Henry F Daniels et al; W K Reid, Win, Zabriskit attorneys? motion to relax costs. 6 Jane Meininott vs James V Memmott; M M Kellogg, George Sutherland, Suth-erland, attumeys; motion to set aside proof, etc. 7 Martin & Drake Live Stock Co vs JohnM Dolton; Geoige Sutherland, King & Houtz, attorneys; demurrer to amend complaint. 8 James C York, Jr. vs Joseph D Jones- King & Houu and Saxey & Whitecotton, Geo Sutherland, attorneys demurrer to complaint. 9 Francis M Wilson vs George i'.rcanoracK et al; King & Houtz, J li Milner and J VV N VVhilecotton.attorneys motion to relax costs and new trial. 10 Anna Marks et al vs W II Cul-mer Cul-mer et al; Geo Sutherland and C S Varum, J G Sutlieiland and Auhur Brown, attorneys; demurierand m.tiou to ictax costs. u Andrew J Wallon et al vs E VV Jones et al; Sutlieiland & Judd, Geo Sutherland, attorneys; motion lor cevJ trial. 12 R.iSiUine G Anderson vs Christian Chris-tian Anderson; G V Moyer, King & Houiz, attorneys; demurrer to Complaint. Comp-laint. ij P C Anderson et al vs Neils j. Bhaseu et al; VV K Held, Jacob Johnsou motion lor new uial. 14 Leo Whitelieand vs A O S.11001 EUChritchlow and J L Rawiings, King & liouts, attorneys; demurrer to corno-Jaint. corno-Jaint. 1 rs Mary Ellen VVestfal! vs Walter K Barton et al; Jacob Johnson,' VV K Reid, attorneys- demurrer to comu-laint. comu-laint. r 16 Emery County Mer. Co. vs Si V. Le Sieur; A. liallinger, Ceorge Sulh-. erland,attorneys;demurrer to complaint r7 Alma Hague vs R. II. Dodd et al; Uooth & Wilson. George Sutherland, attorneys; demurrer to complaint. 18 Ole Madsen vs Hans Marpuard sen; VV. H. King, Geoige Sutherland, attorneys; demurrer to complaint. - 19 Thos. liroadbent vs Monroe Irrigation Ir-rigation Co.; VV .H. McCany, attorney for defendant; motion to dismis reaction. reac-tion. 20 Artemas Holrum vs Pleasant Grove City; Saxey & Whitecotton, King. & Houtz.aitorneys; motion for new trial ai Nephi l'laster & Manufacturing. Co vs H T McCuue; King& Houtz, Booth & Wilson, attorneys; motion to relax costs. 22 George VV Jacques vs Eghraim Sutton et al; M M Kellogg, George Sutherland, attorneys, demurrer to complaint. com-plaint. 13 R M Rogers vs Daniel Cook et al; Saxey & Whrttecotton .Geo Suther land, attorneys; motion lor new trial. 24 I'rovo City vs J C York; King & Houtz, J B Milner, attorneys; motion for new trial. 25 Chester I Paddock vs Worthy Nash;' Saxey & Whitecotton, Geo Sutherland, attorneys; demurrer to amended complaint. com-plaint. (To be Continued.) |