Show AMPUTATED LEO IN COURT Ihrrhlp eInlncd bra Burann edit I ed-it 1lnhnnd of So Who Is I the owner nf nn amputated i leg I Is It the miitllntwl individual or the mutilating surgeon IliU Is I the I mbirrawtlng quontlon Iwforo a court at llruswalt llelgltini so long as the limit It I In place says the Xw York World It Is I raanwly necessary to pay hat tlire cannot arise a doubt of the iwniirthlp pom > Milori It In this clear vim mora than the traditional nine points ot the law Hut when tho knife and saw have don their work when the surgeon lm llnhc his tank dare the proprietor tho original Hcupnnt preserve hU rights In all theIr integrity Or does the artist who him at painted tho memlnr And ransfiirmul 110 tn Iak i Into a naniifatturtxl product acquire by this very fact of his labor the right iidttiKinofriolyof tliailatuchcd pieoaf That 1 I It the problem 1110 cuts stands thus In the month of December last n young woman of Jl newly married Injured herself h j a all MI severely nt to nacustttato the amputation ot fact right leg This op crntlon succereilxl martcilounly and ha surgeon who performed 1 It 1 was so > roud of his work that without lot tong anyone know ha carried the am Initiated limb to Ills oleo and axhlb ted It as n trophy In the most conspicuous corner of his waiting room ho placod nn enormous jar In which the log of his client was pro mrid II In alcohol I and which was Duly dituarJpd In large letters with Iho name addrots and ago of the former iwucr together with this elrcum advances under which the amputation md liean performed Ilia surgeon evldenlly uilculntod nut without sea noil that this PlnwiiIC10 would In a title thing fur Ms imputation b > edifyIng edify-Ing the I public I In n pocnillarl suggis II J nf t 5 lo manner roganllng his wlsJom his ability and his steadiness of hand 1 entirely apart from tho pleasure that It might give a < u sgicclos of work of art so to sneak limo trouble Is I that tho Ingenious doctor had reckoned without his host that Is I to may without the husband title I latter had no sooner learned of the disrespectful lisa that had been made of n part of tho body whoso lord and master ho had tho happiness ot being than ho took prompt legal action Thu surgeon was notified In good und duo form that ha must not only put a stop ut once to the unseem Iy public of thn exhibition but mUll rostoru tho leg without delay to Its rightful I owner title practitioner rejoined that the limb 1 I in dlnmito I having become thanks to him a simple sim-ple anatomical exhibit and bearing tho marks of hit handiwork was In Homo sort a nowh manufactured arty die the fruit ot his labor of which ha had tho nbsolnto right to dispose as ha saw lit and that file husband who had married a wife with two living logs had no light to claim the owner ship of dead ono hors the cnsa taste and nil oho Hoi tans I legal luminaries are lighting vile It |