Show PRINT PAPER TAX NO NOW IS PROPOSED Movement Opposed by Iy John I Norris Morris Representing Newspaper Newspaper News News- paper Publishers Continued From Irom Ia Page Pago o 1 l. fur for relief their reports to the bureau of oC corporations showed that the they were restricting their o output below bolow bo- bo low Jow normal capacity to the tho extent of or tons per pel annum or 13 per cent Thc They were vera aggravating that restriction b by the tho exportation of or tons of oC news print paper papel In Jn the fiscal year of 1911 Any unusual condition arising during luring the year ear such BUch as a n. strike ft fire a drought or 01 blizzard or shortage of cars or congestion of oC traffic would have havo precipitated a situation similar to that in the fall faU of or 1907 1107 and tho spring of oC 1908 when a paper panic cost publishers publishers pub pub- lishers ushers approximately sit Situation Complicated The Thc Inaugurated a campaign to deter Investment estment in new newmills mills and 1111 when thc they failed l to tu top stOp construction In III nn any other othor wa way thc they at attacked at at- tacked the credit of or the tho projectors of or new mills and urged hanl banks s to refuse loans lonn to the thc n now enterprises Mr Ir Norris orlie contended that every cn measure meat meas ure uh tho the United States had directed against this Canadian provinces hall had P I-P- Acted against tho Iho American paper paper- and nOli that Instead of or coin composing the tho hc situation III they c provoked an nn unusual which will ro- ro 1 ears of Intelligent and delicate l handling to adjust Nothing can I bf h. done on h ie tf argued by liy 11 compulsion or tariff f threats to h pr provide wood ool for the American paper industry That dav las nn passed Canada Canada Can Can- ada con controls I rids th the e pulp 1 I. I WOO wood supply u I itH Ihl ti authorities Insist hll that they be 10 dealt dealt with upon a n reasonable busl Hc Senator Hitchcock's proposed amendment amend ment to tho the tariff bill hilI which would put an Increased graduate l tux tax on to tobacco to- to t- t bacco und Its Us manufactures In accordance accord accord- anco ance with a n plan submitted i by Ly Attorney hey ney General it was ws IS re reported re- re ported toda today may not flOt b bo be accepted h by hr tho Ito finance committee Tho feeling expressed is that such Much legislation should not h. h bw 10 made a n part of the tariff tariff bill and that It should bo he given prolonged pro pro- Jon longed ell consideration It nl also nIo o was said among the senators that the tho Play plan had hadnot hadnot not flOt y t had hull tin approval of oC tho admin admin- I 1st t r nl tiun lIun Free Peo listing of or photographic films us used cd in moving mo pictures probably l will vIlL be ho recommended to tu the finance Committee commit Commit- tee teo b by tho the subcommittee l In charge chargo of or the sundries schedule TIt The Tho argument Is that 95 per cent of or the thc films rums use used In itt this country ar are manufactured by ono one American conc concern luG lu G G. G Gennert of oC New ew York today toda filed fileda a brief asking ln that all alt photographic films beo heu on Ott the thc ground that the tho Eastman n Kodak company has hai a mo monopoly Ino- Ino of oC the business That corporation n has been and t Is conducting conducting- its business s In iii n films anti other photographic goods In iii of hr If the tho Sherman antitrust law law said ald n t 0 0 Ii C r t. t aiu The Eastman Boatman company compan has baa filed t n I brief ri e f pro prot protesting t cs c's t I ii g a aga against it s t reel I s t I n on tho ground that the tile C raw inn mn mn tends are arc dutiable |