| Show UTAH DEBATERS LOSE TO COLORADO S i d k rA I ill j A 2 S s 1 ri J IL 1 7 i. i I I. I t 1 A. A f v J UTAH DEflATING TEAM TEAI GAUD GAUD- RIGHT TO CO LEFT MS ER It J. J TRACY TRAC LEF MiD AND V W. W AV W. UTAH DEBATERS lOSE ClASH cm WITH COlORADO Centennial State Representatives tives Argue for Regulation Regulation Regulation Regula Regula- tion of T Trusts Debaters of oC the University of ot Colorado Colorado Colo Cole rado ratio established to the tho satisfaction of ot tho jUdges Judges that thal regulation of or trusts should be the policy of the federal government In preference to tion ton The Colorado team was composed com corn posed pored of ot James lor Samuel Parl- Parl palm parn an and James Millikin ln and tho the Utah 11 team of W W. W W. Yo Straton Stratton Hamilton Gardner and J. J Tracy Wooton Th The Tho affirmative e maintained that trusts arc aro the logical and Inevitable development ot of economic life and can can- not be o overthrown h by any de destructive policy The They further asserted that It i Is the s sentiment of the greatest economists econ econ- of or the United States that competition competition compe compe- Is wasteful and destructive While the nega negative t argument in most Instances was diametrically opposite to that of or the opposing side they further asserted that they favored big big business bustness bust busi ness neR but that thal there I Is a fundamental difference between big bil business and monopoly Ever Every member of the affirmative o team is a n brilliant orator and In itt this respect outshone the Utah men but the tho Centennial state debaters proved better better better bet bet- ter word jugglers than logicians Their refutation was weak compared with sith that presented presente b by the Utah team Wooton of the negative undoubtedly undoubted gave JaVe the most cut clear-cut and pointed refutation The one ono point the affirmative did not succeed in breaking down was that the tho federal government o has hanot not employed d a policy or of dissolution in regard to trusts although for tor tho the last twenty three years cars there thero has been a 0 dissolution statute on paper In not being able to refute reute this the Colorado team was at Its w I IThe The judges for tor the debate were E. E A A. Roger Rogers P. P L L. L Williams and M M. L E E. Wil Wil- I son Judge George Georze G G. Armstrong Armstron acted as chairman While waiting for the decision of ot the Judges which was ns rendered rendered ren rca dered without consultation Miss Iv Ivy Evans E accompanied b by Mi Miss lIss Cornelia Cornelta Cornela Smith gave a vocal selection |