| Show s e n t g n a r s a y 5 g g d a y c o of of ot f g O s d n a d rt a p a 1 S s 9 ti g s Ii In e a h e e a t p hi CROSS APPEAL APPEAL IN SILVER KING CASE Consolidated Company Takes Judge Marshalls Marshall's Ruling to Higher Court Seeking a Judgment four tour times time greater than that awarded It b by I Judge Judg John A. A Marshall l in tho federal I the time Silver King Consolidated Minin Mining court cour company yesterday esterday filed a cros I cross cross-ap ap apI peal in it-i connection with Its litigation against tho tha Silver Silvor King Coalition compan com corn pan pany Judgment for tor with the ac no ac- ac cumulated Interest of oC several se years year was awarded tho Consolidated company compan several eral months ago on the tho showing that the Coalition company compan had fully taken ores from tho the underground workings of or tho plaintiff at Park lark Cit A A. ju judgment Kment of oC the orIs- orIs City inal mat amount asked for tor is the object o the time appeal which is directed to tho United States court of appeals The Coalition company no now has it Its appeal from the first judgment entered in the circuit court and the hearing o on the appeal is sot for tor some time lime In e Sep Sal 1912 A million-dollar million bond bon was necessary for or the defendants defendant's I peal eni and In case the jud Judgment ment is appeal ap ap- affirmed af af- firmed interest running over o year rear eur wIll Avill accrue A 4 long bill of ot errors accompanies the he cross appeal In which tho time arithmetical arith arith- reasoning of or the lie court is QuestIoned ques Ques- on numerous points The Tho case grew s-rew out of or standing long charges r that tho tim Coalition company compan was ia stealing ore from the adjoining erty of ot the Consolidated company property prop prop- Th The I hearing of or the case occupied more amoco than tha n a 1 year ear In which investigations were conducted showing showing- the exact tonna tonnage I removed Illegally h by time the defendant nt company compan Deducting cost Coat of ot production I tion ion and treatment the tho plaintiff valued value d I this ore at well over Representatives of ot the Consolidated Consolidate tell ti company compan sa say the tIle cross appeal filed file d tid yesterday esterday Is calculated chiefly to ex ox IX the time case b by bringing both sides side s before eforo the court of ot appeals at the sam same e I time lime |
