Show THI SNOH CASE Jdore Ihe tllet lelul Arlulell 1uprelr Court AsnrsaTos April J9 VrRuraent hns begun be-gun In the SapremcCourt of tho United States in tlio cnses of Lorcnro bnow vs the United tales in error to tho Supreme Curt of Utah Snow wns prosecuted in the District Curt of Iho First Judicial Dlsteict of Utah unlawful nder the Tdmnnds Act for unter ohnuitatlon with seven women Ho was convicted and Riven the highest punIshment under Iho law nnd is low undergoing imprisonment in the 1cnl cntlory There were three indictments gainst him charging 1dm with the commls ion of the crimo during tho yenrK 18S31881 nnt during Iho first eleven months of 1885 cspcctlvely nnd on cacti ho wni convicted On appeal to tko Supremo Court of the Ter ilory tho judgment of tho District Court was affirmed fho questions iu tho case icforo this court involve the construction and effect of tho third section of the 1M mnnds net nnd what constitutes nn offense under i nlso the evidence admissible to provo I GcorRO Jichnor Curtis nnd Iranklln D tichnrds nrocounsol for Snow lllcunrds opened the argument with n slnlcmont of tho points Involved in the case |