Show IDIITO IJ GS rUI COltlunton or thr IRIIorl ne Court reopened nt 2 oeloek nnd P W Indscn look the stand and was exam ned bv the prosecution Had sold furniture fur-niture to defendant remembered that defendant moved from tho State Road to the houso on Westemple street took a mortgage ns secunt for the goods took osscssion of the furniture in November efcndant told witness that she was gong go-ng to leave nnd ho had better take the urniture went there with his len nnd removed the furniti ro A Itness excused Isaac Wolf was then recalled Am in he wholesale and retail liquor business 1 Dav enport know I n Main I street I Or nnny vhcro in place of business was Mr Schaeficr was next called and in nswcrtoMr Varmns questions said louse now on defendant tho Stalo I Brought Road to tho her bouse from tho on Vest Temple street Wns at the houso ho last time about the middle of October Octo-ber Defendant told witness that she was omg to t send for Bomn women to open n louse of t prostitution li Knew ru I Ito I-to havo had the reputation of keeping 1 honRe of 111 fame Had heard defendant av that she kept mich n house Lxnmincd i kf defense Have heard persons Bay that It was I house of ill fame B Y Hampton was sworn an 1 said hat ho would hko to know before being worn whether or not ills testimony vouldbo taken giving as a 1 reason for his question tho fIle that the tcstimonv of several of his friends had been refusal in the consjirac cise Iho Court ordered the witness to bo sworn and his exnmmntion was commenced Knew FI Davenport know of tho house in jucstlon When asked as to tho repu tntion of the house Mr Hampton declined de-clined to answer on the ground that It i would bo sell incriminating Mr Varian asked severd questions In retard low hit witness had lostificd before be-fore tlio Grand lur all then proeeodec lo show wli witness should bo forced to answer the nbovo question ques-tion The drift of 11 Vnrnns ir Aliment was lo the elite t tli it witness hlllJ onClJ lived tlie pnvilcte of refusing re-fusing to answer could not now rctrie and clum tint 1 privilege I Before eon eluding 1 Air Van in asked 1 the fiirthe question as to whether the witness had not mado an affidavit to the effect that the s ud houso was us represented Witness Wit-ness also refined to mswer this quts tion Tlio question ns to whether wittier should or should not allswer was htl beingnigucil when wo went to press |