Show CIIm IAN TUCKKHS IIUOTIIHU Tho llopnhlican orgin in ChIll city wlillo tho Utah question was bciiifi con Bulcroil In tlioJutllplary Coinmltlcoof tho Huiisc undo tho statement lolh In its special Wisliingloii dispitcho1 nml nli torhlly tliat u hrollior of Chairman Tucker was II paid attorney of tho Mor mOils nl tho Capital Although thisuas denied liy tho Chnirniin and alno by tlio rciiresentuticsof liolh the Gentilo and Jlormon people at Washington at tho time the Salt Lake Hcpnbllcan ortian within tlto last tow dajs reiterated the U3srtioii which it must or at least should hoe knon WAS imlrue In proof of tho falsity of thu sUtinnentH II o S publish Ilio following from tho printed testimony befoto tho Jmliunry Com mitteo A copy of tho pipei icIer red to having been prodiueil before a0 1 the eommitteo the follow ing extract was ret < I I17Oa4irl IIlIlr it in ntnled hint the olmlrnmn of the Ilh1 1 llama Judiciary Comiuiltto J Hinilolph It1giI 11 Tucker of VirKintn nntl which committoo 1illih has now under coniiderntiou tho dunindB UftPt 11 bill an it came from the Senate has n brother in this city who lion boon retained l 0 r i as the hold 1 attorney of tho Mormon Church 1 The Chairman Ono moment This in I an i in antiMormon > nlOrl ii1nLL i Mr Weal YDS sir thy urcnn of the loilH i lR j fl llil a yr ulemuil represented by Mr Jtinltin Ilio Chairman do not intend l tlmt that extract Blinlt K ° into Otis record with that ii i r Htatomout In HKiml llo my biothor without a correction ij 4i Mr llaskin I am no moro respoimblo for 11 that than la the gentleman iIl ° o 1 1 he Cuairman1 do not caro who is ret re-t i BKjimililo for it 1 merely want to say that I I 4 the Ntatomont that my brother lion buun ro b o I tninodas a paid attorneynf Ilio t Mot Mo-t ii 0 Church In abaolntcly falmi it E011 Mr Caino ihat ID I HO I will nay that I libl 4 havo engaged all of this ntturnuya that havo flf Ui i been engaged and 1 do not know Mr ii 11Llt iteverl locker 1 have hover met him so 11ifl it 10 coukl not he engaged in I any way 5 Iiilt Mr lluntoon Wo certainly have nover II lS recognized him ail a colleague in the ens MrOibnonlIe gentleman who Bent turn i lJ fom hd 11 oti dispatch wan Mr Goodwin who wan hero n I iS short time since and called IullOn tho com i2ISt i8l mittee in company with Mr Ilaakm l Mr Jiaskin How do > ou know that 1 Mr Gibson Well I know it Mr Uaskin You dont know anything I about it a The Chairman saw some time ago an intimation of tho kind that in contained in 00 14 this dispatch I Informed myself on tho I subject and what I now state is l upon undoubted tt ll 1 doubted Information I My brother has had I I nothing to do with that matter and has I known nothing about it If ho had l ho hover f II would have Bought to approach moon tho II subject nor if ho 1 had would his nppionch a have had any effect upon mo 1 Mr Haskin I will nay thin that I have not the honor of knowing your brother Mr a Chairman but if ho is II lawyer do not BOO 0 I that there is I anything prevent him from i taking a retainer this matter The Chinaman Uzcent tho fact that my brother in too honorable II gentleman to it take n fee or take a position with regard to any matter that was likely to como before a committee of which his brother was chairman chair-man I Further onnear thu end l of the printed ii report appears the following Mr liaskin I want to add this to what I have just said l that 1 am not at all in sympathy sym-pathy with what is said in those newspaper articles that have been read here and I ro gret very mnch their publication I Ihoso IV publications are beyond my control 1 The Chairman understand that of monte 1 would not have Raid anything with regard to what was contained in thu article read by tho guitlcman had it not contained an imputation upon my brother which I know to bo false and had 1 remained re-mained silent and allowed tho statement togo to-go forth in the record l which is being made here my silence might in tho future have boon construed an acquiescence Hero is a denial and < a perfect refutation refuta-tion of tlio charge that Chairman TucketH brother was in any manner connected with the Mormon and iintiMormon contest con-test at Washington Thu denial Is mada by tho representatives of both parties I them as ell as by the Clnirm him self It in II matter of record and l jet in tho blindness engendered by partian venom tho Republican organ ignores the above incontrovertible proof and l repeats tlio slanderous charges In the fain of tIle testimony adduced < before the committee Tlio question is will r the people belch the btatemenls of Chairman Tucker Mi Huskin Mr Oib soil Mr lluntoon and Delegate Ciine or will they believe the nnsiipiioitcd assertion of tho Republican organ 1 |