Show ir r v wa wai asked why ity the talus far hid faidel to lo lodge any ally trust magnates magnate la in prison e have babe done the apt wp ftp could he said eald but there lias has been in nil lift willingness illin gness on the part of alip juries and courts to sentence men m to prison under the antl anti trust law laft I 1 otil the hie su sil preme court laid doan it definite ron on it ruction in the two to claps c ispa juat tie de odell their reluctance lelu clance was 1 I vell ell un derbwood for the law li big is always bern been oleu to question ind ivis his been con in dinci vincient din ent was b different ilif dif terent courts juries aap lit becoming more willing ron 1101 to convict ani aej judges who have acu bi LII t to 0 amrose cist pairon penalties penal now hive the supreme out cent to them nit mr said lir lie lieeel lIi eel prison pillion nouh I 1 ie e tile llie most moh effective boeing toeing of respect iPpe ct for the die antitrust dull ilas I 1 rim HILL nal flat pro liro tile the mitat nit at pickers packers milk dealvis deabi is gro i rs tin till stores and andon alks gl ss combinations anil and allego allesch 1 ilola lola lors torb of the anti arit la he be siad ald would he be aug augmenter mentel by b other on OIL this subject the so go cut had debolle plans |