Show A TO ml III I 1 the proposition of municipal ONN ownership it of the electric light aich is to be disca discussed cd on night ba b the mass mas ruc meeting eting of tapa ti pars ars c billed billed to meet in the ol 01 en cri house is i 1 big question ind it should lie ip p pro ached cd N till birc ord ard thoughtful nona on thi OIL dirt of the citizens of this ul intile cilc it is a most desirable desi state for a comm community unit to own oin its linter aler ind light blants l lants it lb ib hiedl the right thin thing to crush out t the he existing light compan NN w without some come consideration it is too much 1 I a e i I 1 full gronn gronin nun m in crushing out a lu lust iut baise bc Ise lie he has the PO potta 1 the present light comp comani na came to richfield nhen the citi nai in such fin tint thit it could not instill an electric light plant the hid just been completed ind and the cit fathers tio ht thit hit the system vas iab all that could lc be at that time tom forn bron came here and iNith without out a dollar of guarantee ce in patro patronage patrom nige ge lie he d I 1 stearn lit p tit nt for lighting the cit citi aftel 3 bears ears of struggle tru ic ile he to so se cure 1 i I small email vatar rig alit lit or os the i alley and instilled ed an enlarged tern at a great dutli of monea mone chih money had to be secured by bonding and if the cita cit decides to own its onn on lighting thee should be some consideration gian to the local company compan so that it v still ill not be thrown D out of business without it bout an equitable adjustment i it has cost much mone and much effort to establish the present system and while municipal ownership is more desirable desi than primate own of utilities let the la papers consider well ell the small company minch will be pushed to the wall if any weins can be de demce i ed for an adjustment of the two proposition it should not lit be neglected |