| OCR Text |
Show (iOES TOJHECflURTS Denver' I'rolilblllnn Troubto Soon ' To Ue Coniludctl. Il:XVKIt. Colo. Nov. . The cane to determine whether the xtate has the right to enact and enforce Mate-wide Mate-wide prohibition legislation waa placed plac-ed before the Mate ttipreme court )e-terday )e-terday with tho filing of n reply brief by l-red farrnr. attorney general A declnion In tookeil for In December nnd in expettctl to form n bant for the ttirnnement of ntatewldo prohibition prohi-bition In Colorado, which become effective ef-fective Jnnunry I, 191 The supreme court took original Jurl-db tlon In the proceeding at the request of Governor Carlson nnd. At-tornev At-tornev Uenernl I'nrrar. the Denver Clt) mithorltlen agreeing thereto The ense Involved Issuance by city nli-thoiltle nli-thoiltle of a en loon license extending lie). .ml Januar) I, 1J1, to August Koih The state claim that under tho conrtllutlonal amendment nnd legln-Intlve legln-Intlve enavtmeiit the manufacture. Importation Im-portation or sale of liquor In Colorado after January 1st In Illegal, nnd that the slate poNtesse nuthnrlt) to en-fone en-fone these enactments. The clt) argue that It I operating under n special charter granted by the legislature and that this ihartrr give to the ell) the right to control the manufacture, sole or giving avva) of Intoxbatlug liquor. |
