Show i district court holds I 1 brief court session S the november term of the dist brict court was in session here for a ij day clay or two the first of the week at y which time several cues cases were tried V and disposed of while others were y taken under advisement by the court until a future term H i the case of the state of utah vs lt be virginia adair which was tried and le ij resulted in a hung jury at a recent ile court term was continued again for another term tenn the case of the state r vs wm corry cony a companion to the adair case was passed with the del 1 fondant permitted to enlist in the army the case will probably be e dismissed from the calendar when tl ei carrys enlistment is completed te in the case of the state vs wm sl 4 fee which was continued from the i last term fee was arraigned and ti ij charged with the following A delf testable crime against nature he pleaded not guilty and trial was held before a jury with A M marsden appointed by the court to defend the case and durham morris county attorney and ellis pickett district attorney prosecuting the me jury consisted of raymond knell rulon lyman page P F knell alma evans C L robinson lester gower john jensen and da david vu d H dalton the case was tried on tuesday afternoon and wednesday with the case going to the jury late that afternoon after an hour and fifteen minutes of deliberation the jury brought in a verdict of guilty and the court set december 4 at aa 5 p in as the time for passing sentence an li other similar crime against the defendant was passed and will probably be dismissed in the meantime 1 I mr fee is in custody of the county sheriff until such time as he can raise bond of 1500 or sentence is passed on him in the civil division of the 1 r court blanche e ness as the standard supply co vs millard halterman involving suit on a note was tried and taken under advisement by the court in the case of alban and mary YDo Db brusky vs parowan carowan city corporation in which the plaintiffs are asking the court to restore water a to them which was sold off the lot they own before they got possession of it attorney A M marsden is plaintiffs attorney and H C parcells is representing city evidence was submitted after which the plaintiffs were given 30 days to amend their corn complaint plaint to include as defendants max and avis hendrickson who sold the water off the lot or were in possession of it at the time it was sold and P H gurr the purchaser of the water the court wants them to have an opportunity to testify the case involves the citizens right to sell the water off the city lot he holds mr and mrs darrell were awarded papers of adoption for the sattley baby which they have had in their possession for the past several months |