Show Davis School Bud Budget et Ol Okayed ayed The Annual School Budget hearing for the year 70 1969 was held Monday evening June 30 as previously adver adver- THE REPORT on the revised budget was very complete and consisted of 2 23 24 pages thai that covered every branch and category of the operation of the Davis County School system system system tem right down to the final figure of 33 cents Those present were the five members of the Board of Education Education Education Edu Edu- cation Irvin Cleverly District 1 Chairman of the Board Morris Hansen District 5 Vice President lI Henry nry E E. E Peterson l District Distri t 2 2 Harold HaroldJ J J. J Gailey District 3 i 1 Lynn W. W Burton District 4 1 and Hollis Grange Board Clerk County Superintendent of Schools Bernell Wrigley W. W Robert Keddington and Assistant Superintendents Lawrence E E. E Welling and Dwaynne Jay Superintendent of school buildings and gro grounds A CLOSE review of the entire budget was given by the Board and it was given their unanimous unanimous approval The public had been invited to the hearing with no one appearing except newspaper reporters Following is the summarized report of the school budget for the year 70 1969 Maintenance and Operation School Lunch and Foods 1 Capi Capital ll Outlay Outlay Out Out- lay and Debt Service Tot Total l 25 SUPT WRIGLEY had this to say regarding the 70 1969 budget The budget is approximately approximately approximately ap ap- ap- ap proximately higher than last year The increase has been made possible through the great greater r appropriations of the 1969 Legislature for the purpose of meeting the increased costs of education A great part of this will go toward meeting the salaries of both professional and nonprofessional nonprofessional nonprofessional non personnel Recently the school districts are experiencing the highest interest rates in many years both tax anticipation notes and bonding This is definitely a factor in the increased bud bud- get THE BOARD also reviewed the proposed map previously presented to the County Com Com- missioners The new boundary y lines of the five school districts and the five Legislative districts districts districts dis dis- dis- dis would be the same The boundary changes would also divide the voters in each of the Legislative Districts to the matter of a percent dif dif- dif dif- ference The following is what these boundary line changes show l School Leg Legislative District District Voters fo No 1 No 45 2051 No 2 No 46 2002 No 3 No 47 1871 l I No 4 No 48 2020 I No 5 No 49 1972 CONSIDERATION will have to be given to the fact that there will be 17 new voting districts added before the next t regular election Further considerations considerations considerations con con- of these changes will have to be considered before before before be be- fore any permanent action can be taken as all parties concerned concerned concerned con con- will have to be con con- I The Board in reviewing reviewing me changes saw nothing at this time that would not be favorable favorable favorable favor favor- able to the school districts and will wait to see what action will be taken on the final decisions decisions de de- 1 |